Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/plugin install actionlintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02958 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00592 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00296 |
Grade A, and why
setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pre-computed context
check's tool probes ran at load time. Read these rows instead of re-issuing them; each shows the
tool's path when present, or absent when missing:
node: !command -v node 2>/dev/null || echo absentactionlint: !command -v actionlint 2>/dev/null || echo absent
A row reading [shell command execution disabled by policy] carries no result: run that tool's
command -v probe via Bash instead.
Purpose
Thin check-centric setup per the uniform setup contract (docs/plugin-philosophy.md
"Setup is explicit and repeatable" in the marketplace repository): check inspects and
reports, apply resolves. The only consumer-project files this plugin owns are its git-hook
entry copies, which apply install-git-hooks writes. actionlint auto-discovers its own optional
config from the repository, and the tunables are the native userConfig options
(actionlint_enabled and actionlint_end_of_turn). Every prerequisite is a PATH binary the
plugin never bundles, and the plugin never installs system packages, so apply is
guidance-and-verify with that one write path. It never modifies user settings or the plugin
cache.
Action routing: no argument or check runs the check; apply runs the check first, then
offers remediation guidance; apply install-git-hooks registers the git-hook entry. All are
non-interactive. Never prompt when the action is given. apply install-git-hooks asks only where
its section says to.
check (read-only)
The git-hook script (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/git-hooks/actionlint-check.sh) is the single source
of truth for what it requires and how it resolves things.
Read it first. Probe what it actually does, don't recite this file. Then read the pre-computed tool rows, run the remaining probes via Bash, and report a PASS/FAIL/INFO table with one remediation line per FAIL. Do not modify anything.
When the plugin's toggle is disabled, every prerequisite absence except node downgrades from
FAIL to INFO. The Claude Code hooks exit through their enabled-gate before probing anything, so a
deliberately disabled plugin is not broken. Report those probes informationally and note that
re-enabling restores the FAIL semantics. A missing node stays FAIL: the launcher runs before the
enabled-gate.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +4 lines 96d5d155ae64
- yesterday Changed · +33 lines · +13 tokens per session 553825206da0
- 4d ago Changed · +4 lines 0d91c7575943
- 13d ago Changed 71493c6e91c8
- 14d ago Changed 2c64da701877
- 18d ago Changed · +10 lines d1662aa52bf9
- 20d ago Changed · +16 lines 8b00e4ce3f2a
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 66d916bf7065
- 1mo ago Changed 830c1fd9ff12
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A c2a5f56d0779
setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository melodic-software/claude-code-plugins (26 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,958 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ci-log-interpretation
Use this skill when reading or analyzing CI logs from a Shopware GitHub Actions workflow to figure out why a build failed — phrases like "why did CI fail", "what broke the build", "check the pipeline", "interpret these logs", "debug this red build" — or whenever raw run logs, job logs, or check annotations from a…
parallel-orchestrator
Manage parallel Claude Code workstreams using git worktrees. Use when: splitting large tasks across multiple workers, coordinating parallel development, monitoring worker progress, integrating completed work, analyzing work item documents (code reviews, issue lists). Triggers: parallel, orchestrator, worktrees…
parallel-worker
Execute focused implementation tasks in a parallel workflow. Use when: working on assigned files in a worktree, making checkpoint commits, signaling dependencies or blockers, completing orchestrator-assigned tasks. Triggers: worker, checkpoint, worktree, assigned scope, commit prefix, parallel task.
optimize-local-search
For NP-hard optimization: TSP, scheduling, assignment problems. Uses greedy construction + local improvement (2-opt, hill climbing).
pass-function-as-arg
For generic algorithms: strategy pattern, callbacks, configurable behavior. Pass functions as parameters to customize algorithm behavior.
test-with-examples
For example-driven development: test cases as specifications, input/output pairs, documentation through examples.