Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack --skill skill-templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack/skill-template)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack/skill-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack/skill-template/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack/skill-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack/skill-template.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00587 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00293 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
skill-template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill Title
Replace every bracketed placeholder. Delete this quote block and the
Safety & Handlingsection if the skill does not touch live malware samples. Keep section order.
When to Use
- [Concrete trigger: a situation where this skill is the right tool]
- [Another trigger]
- [Another trigger]
Do not use for [explicit out-of-scope cases]; instead reach for [the correct skill].
Prerequisites
- [Tool + minimum version, with install/download pointer]
- [Lab/environment requirement]
- [Prior knowledge or input artifact required]
Safety & Handling
(Sample-handling skills only — delete otherwise.)
- Work only inside an isolated analysis VM with no path to production or the internet unless deliberately routed through a controlled gateway.
- Store samples encrypted or in password-protected archives (password
infected); never leave live samples loose on disk. - Defang indicators (
hxxp://,1.2.3[.]4) in any output that leaves the lab. - Never execute a sample on the host or detonate outside the sandbox.
Workflow
Step 1: [Action]
[What to do and why.]
# Real, runnable command — not pseudocode
tool --do-the-thing sample.bin
Step 2: [Action]
[Explanation.]
# Original example code
Step 3: [Action]
[Explanation.]
Validation
- [How to confirm the analysis/hunt produced a correct, trustworthy result]
- [A cross-check or second method to corroborate findings]
Pitfalls
- [Common mistake and how to avoid it]
- [Evasion trick or false-positive trap to watch for]
References
- See
references/api-reference.mdfor tooling details and the full list of sources this skill was synthesized from. - [Key external source — title and URL]
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 95 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A d515329f9437
skill-template is a skill published in the GitHub repository meltedinhex/analyst-ai-pack (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 587 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware in Ghidra by parsing Go buildinfo and pclntab structures, recovering stripped/obfuscated function names (e.g. via GoResolver), and extracting embedded module/dependency strings and types from Go binaries. Use when analyzing a Go-language malware sample, deobfuscating a…
analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf
Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects. Use when triaging a suspicious PDF attachment from a phishing email, analyzing a PDF-based exploit document, or building detection signatures for weaponized PDF…
analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf
Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects. Use when triaging a suspicious PDF attachment from a phishing email, analyzing a PDF-based exploit document, or building detection signatures for weaponized PDF…
analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf
A Chinese-language skill for examining suspicious PDF files with peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser. It is intended for static malware analysis, which studies a file without running it.
analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf
Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects.
analyzing-malicious-pdf-with-peepdf
Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects.