Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding/llm-coding-guidelinesnpx skills add mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding --skill llm-coding-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-codingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding/llm-coding-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding/llm-coding-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding/llm-coding-guidelines.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00551 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
llm-coding-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to karpathy-guidelines — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 69 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 7bf092aa3f1f
llm-coding-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository mertso13/gemini-skill-karpathy-coding (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 551 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to karpathy-guidelines, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
react-test-engineer
Expert guidance for testing React applications using React Testing Library and Vitest. Focuses on user-centric testing, accessibility, and best practices for unit and integration tests to ensure robust and maintainable code.
expert-code-refactoring
Expert code refactoring for Java, JavaScript, and React projects. Focuses on SOLID principles, design patterns, and idiomatic improvements while ensuring test stability.
frontend-ui-designer
Expert guidance for creating modern, intuitive, and visually stunning user interfaces. Use this skill when designing or implementing frontend UIs, components, layout structures, or styling.
bug-investigator
Expert guidance for systematic bug hunting, root-cause analysis, and regression testing. Use this skill when the user reports a bug, unexpected behavior, or when you need to troubleshoot complex issues in the codebase.
code-reviewer
Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security, performance, and maintainability across multiple programming languages. Use this skill when the user wants a PR review, code analysis, or suggestions for improvement. This skill includes proprietary checklists and a mandatory review template located in its…
project-analyzer
Analyzes a project's codebase to generate a comprehensive summary including tech stack, features, and REST services, outputting the result to PROJECTSUMMARY.md. This skill has assets directory that MUST be used for every analysis.