Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/metagit-ai/metagit-cli/gitnexus-refactoringnpx skills add metagit-ai/metagit-cli --skill gitnexus-refactoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metagit-ai/metagit-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metagit-ai/metagit-cli/gitnexus-refactoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metagit-ai/metagit-cli/gitnexus-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metagit-ai/metagit-cli/gitnexus-refactoring.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01050 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00525 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to gitnexus-refactoring — 61 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactoring with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Rename this function safely"
- "Extract this into a module"
- "Split this service"
- "Move this to a new file"
- Any task involving renaming, extracting, splitting, or restructuring code
Workflow
1. gitnexus_impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) → Map all dependents
2. gitnexus_query({query: "X"}) → Find execution flows involving X
3. gitnexus_context({name: "X"}) → See all incoming/outgoing refs
4. Plan update order: interfaces → implementations → callers → tests
If "Index is stale" → run
npx gitnexus analyzein terminal.
Checklists
Rename Symbol
- [ ] gitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "oldName", new_name: "newName", dry_run: true}) — preview all edits
- [ ] Review graph edits (high confidence) and ast_search edits (review carefully)
- [ ] If satisfied: gitnexus_rename({..., dry_run: false}) — apply edits
- [ ] gitnexus_detect_changes() — verify only expected files changed
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Extract Module
- [ ] gitnexus_context({name: target}) — see all incoming/outgoing refs
- [ ] gitnexus_impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) — find all external callers
- [ ] Define new module interface
- [ ] Extract code, update imports
- [ ] gitnexus_detect_changes() — verify affected scope
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Split Function/Service
- [ ] gitnexus_context({name: target}) — understand all callees
- [ ] Group callees by responsibility
- [ ] gitnexus_impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) — map callers to update
- [ ] Create new functions/services
- [ ] Update callers
- [ ] gitnexus_detect_changes() — verify affected scope
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Tools
gitnexus_rename — automated multi-file rename:
gitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "validateUser", new_name: "authenticateUser", dry_run: true})
→ 12 edits across 8 files
→ 10 graph edits (high confidence), 2 ast_search edits (review)
→ Changes: [{file_path, edits: [{line, old_text, new_text, confidence}]}]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 123 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 6b3d0a4983d8
gitnexus-refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository metagit-ai/metagit-cli (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,050 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to gitnexus-refactoring, differing in 61 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-cadence
Pipeline for turning one R&D artefact (PR, PoC, analysis) into one public post — briefing or deep dive — plus a social derivative where the overlay scopes one in. Triggers when an R&D output is ready to become content, or when drafting any blog post for the site. Enforces the anonymisation gate and repo editorial…
evm
Help users answer one question: "Are we on track?" using Earned Value Management metrics. This skill replaces gut-feel status reporting and traffic-light dashboards with four computed numbers (SV, SPI, CV, CPI) that tell you exactly where a project stands — in schedule and in budget — at any point in time.
tco
Help users answer one question: "What will this actually cost?" using Total Cost of Ownership analysis. This skill replaces sticker-price comparisons with lifetime cost calculations that include maintenance, operations, time value of money, and residual value.
montecarlo
Help users answer one question: "What's the probability we finish by this date?" using Monte Carlo schedule simulation. This skill replaces single-point PERT estimates with full probability distributions over project duration.
pert
Help users produce defensible project estimates using PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) with optional reality adjustments via insight tags. This skill replaces gut-feel single-point estimates with structured three-point estimation and confidence intervals.
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…