Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-code-review-deepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-code-review-deep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-code-review-deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-code-review-deep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-code-review-deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-code-review-deep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01084 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
metago-code-review-deep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
深度代码审查（metago-code-review-deep）
描述
对代码进行多维度分级审查，检测逻辑错误、安全漏洞、性能问题、可维护性缺陷、风格不一致。输出含修复建议和优先级的结构化报告。
触发条件
- 用户请求代码审查、PR Review、Code Review 时激活
- 代码提交前审查（pre-commit hook 场景）
- 与
metago-decision-lock协同：开发者任务输出代码时强制触发
核心流程
1. 静态结构分析
- 文件组织与模块划分是否合理
- 函数/类职责是否单一
- 依赖关系是否清晰（无循环依赖）
- 代码重复度检测（DRY 原则）
2. 逻辑正确性审查
- 边界条件处理（空值、极值、越界）
- 异常路径覆盖（错误处理、资源释放）
- 并发安全（竞态条件、死锁）
- 算法正确性（时间复杂度、空间复杂度）
3. 安全漏洞审查
- 注入漏洞（SQL/命令/XSS）
- 认证授权缺陷
- 敏感信息泄露（硬编码密钥、日志泄密）
- 依赖漏洞（已知 CVE）
4. 性能审查
- 数据库查询效率（N+1、全表扫描）
- 内存泄漏风险
- 不必要的同步阻塞
- 资源未释放（文件句柄、连接池）
5. 可维护性审查
- 命名清晰度（变量、函数、类）
- 注释完整度（复杂逻辑、公共 API）
- 单一职责原则遵循度
- 开闭原则遵循度
分级标准
| 级别 | 含义 | 处理时机 |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Critical | 必须立即修复（安全漏洞、数据丢失、崩溃） | 阻断合并 |
| 🟠 Major | 应在合并前修复（逻辑错误、性能严重问题） | 阻断合并 |
| 🟡 Minor | 建议修复（可维护性、风格） | 可后续修复 |
| 🔵 Info | 提示性建议（优化、最佳实践） | 仅记录 |
输出格式
【深度代码审查报告】
文件：path/to/file.ext
审查范围：函数/类/模块
总体评分：XX/100
🔴 Critical（N 项）
[C-001] 行 XX: 问题描述
影响：...
修复建议：...
依据：...
🟠 Major（N 项）
[M-001] 行 XX: 问题描述
影响：...
修复建议：...
🟡 Minor（N 项）
[m-001] 行 XX: 问题描述
建议改进：...
🔵 Info（N 项）
[i-001] 建议优化：...
审查结论：✅ 通过 / ❌ 需修复后重新审查
与其他技能的协同
- 与
metago-critique协同：审查过程应用 L1-L5 批判性分析 - 与
metago-fact-check协同：检测虚构 API、不存在的函数（幻觉代码） - 与
metago-decision-lock协同：审查报告需通过决策锁校验 - 与
metago-problem-trace协同：问题无限溯源至根本原因 - 与
metago-security-audit协同：安全维度联动深度安全审计 - 与
metago-refactor-suggest协同：可维护性问题联动重构建议
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 104 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 414bfa0d3d2e
metago-code-review-deep is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,084 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
vue-best-practices
A review checklist for Vue 2 and Vue 3 components, covering component names, prop declarations, TypeScript casts, API styles and complex template expressions.
plugin-quality
A review guide for checking Zhin.js plugins before release. It covers plugin structure, feature declarations, resource cleanup, message sending, and security.
rust-review
A Rust code-review skill for services, checking for crashes, unsafe SQL construction, exposed credentials, ignored errors, and unfinished code.
review-skill
Inspect, safely test, and assess one Runx skill package for capability, trust, and operator readiness. Use when deciding whether to adopt, improve, reject, install, or publish a skill; its evidence-only assess runner is available when native test evidence already exists.
github-pr-comment
Post one exact GitHub pull-request comment through local gh, any compatible hosted connector, or the explicit human-gated MCP composition, with retry safety and independent readback.
security-review
A code-review check for three security problems: SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and secrets such as passwords or API keys stored in source code.