metago-fact-check

metago-fact-check is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from metago-ai/metagolifeform. It costs 66 tokens per session (916 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A fact-checking and wording-review procedure for statements about outside organizations, partnerships, and other external facts. It labels the confidence and status of claims and flags wording that presents uncertain relationships as established facts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review claims about companies or institutions, label partnership status, assess evidence confidence, and replace overstated wording with more cautious wording.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unsupported, misleading, or exaggerated claims from appearing in generated text. It also makes uncertainty visible when the available evidence is limited.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to review claims about companies or institutions, label partnership status, assess evidence confidence, and replace overstated wording with more cautious wording.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-fact-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeform

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for metago-fact-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for metago-fact-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-fact-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 916 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.00916
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.00458
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00183
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00092

Measured 12d ago against content hash 36dab0b640fb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

metago-fact-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/agent-plugins-1.0.0/skills/metago-fact-check/SKILL.md · 82 lines

What it actually says

事实核查(Fact Check)

此技能确保所有涉及外部事实的陈述准确、真实、合规,杜绝夸大、虚构和误导性表述。

触发条件

检测到以下关键词自动触发:

  • 合作、协同、伙伴、结盟
  • 已建立、已完成、已对接
  • 深度、战略、紧密、全面
  • 任何企业/机构名称

执行步骤

步骤1:合作伙伴状态标注

每个合作伙伴首次出现时必须附带状态标签:

状态 标签 定义 置信度
已合作 ✅ 已合作 有签署协议或已实质性合作 ≥0.9
意向中 🔄 意向中 已初步接洽,正在推进 0.7-0.89
待接触 👀 待接触 锁定目标,尚未正式对接 0.5-0.69
调研发现 📊 调研发现 基于公开信息识别,未接触 <0.5

标注格式: [状态标签] 企业名称 - 合作领域(置信度XX%)

步骤2:事实置信度评估

置信度 标签 含义
90-100% ✅ 已确认 多源验证,有明确证据链
70-89% 📊 较高置信度 单源但权威
50-69% ⚠️ 待核实 基于可靠推理
<50% 🔍 需确认 推测或意向

置信度<50%的信息不得作为确定事实呈现。

步骤3:夸大表述检测

检测并修正夸大词汇:

  • 一级夸大(系数0.3): 协同、合作、伙伴
  • 二级夸大(系数0.5): 深度、紧密、全面
  • 三级夸大(系数0.8): 战略、核心、主导
  • 四级夸大(系数1.0): 垄断、绝对、颠覆

修正规则:

  • 状态为"意向中" → 替换为"正在推进""意向中"
  • 状态为"待接触" → 替换为"目标锁定""潜在伙伴"
  • 状态为"调研发现" → 替换为"基于调研识别""潜在目标"
  • 无证据 → 自动阻断输出

步骤4:自动修正

不符合实际状态的夸大表述自动替换为中性表述,修正后输出必须附带说明。

输出示例

修正前: "与腾盾科创建立深度协同"
修正后: "已锁定[👀待接触]腾盾科创为目标合作伙伴"

修正前: "与沃飞长空战略合作"
修正后: "与[🔄意向中]沃飞长空正在推进合作"
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 82 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 36dab0b640fb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

metago-fact-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 916 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.