Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-security-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-security-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01750 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
metago-security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 179 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
安全审计(metago-security-audit)
描述
基于 OWASP Top 10 进行多维度安全审计,检测注入漏洞、认证授权缺陷、敏感信息泄露、依赖漏洞。输出含 CVE 引用、漏洞等级、修复方案的结构化报告。遵循 A36 法律优先于效率原则。
触发条件
- 用户请求安全审计、漏洞扫描、渗透测试时激活
- 代码合并前安全审查
- 依赖更新时安全评估
- 与
metago-compliance协同:合规检查时联动安全审计 - 涉及用户数据、支付、权限的功能强制触发
核心流程
1. OWASP Top 10 检查
A01 - 失效的访问控制
- 路径遍历漏洞(../、绝对路径)
- 越权访问(水平/垂直越权)
- 未授权 API 端点
- 缺失权限校验
A02 - 加密失败
- 明文传输(HTTP、未加密 WebSocket)
- 弱加密算法(MD5、SHA1、DES)
- 硬编码密钥/证书
- 敏感数据明文存储
A03 - 注入
- SQL 注入(拼接查询、未参数化)
- 命令注入(shell 拼接、eval)
- XSS(反射型、存储型、DOM 型)
- LDAP/XPath/NoSQL 注入
A04 - 不安全设计
- 缺失威胁建模
- 不安全的业务流程(可重放、可绕过)
- 缺失速率限制(暴力破解、DoS)
- 敏感操作无二次确认
A05 - 安全配置错误
- 默认凭证未修改
- 错误信息泄露堆栈/路径
- 不安全的 HTTP 头(缺失 CSP、HSTS)
- 不必要的功能启用(DEBUG、TRACE)
A06 - 易受攻击的组件
- 已知 CVE 的依赖
- 过时依赖(超过 N 个版本)
- 未经审计的依赖(无签名、无 SBOM)
- 供应链攻击风险
A07 - 认证失败
- 弱密码策略
- 会话管理缺陷(固定会话、不过期)
- 缺失多因素认证(高权限场景)
- 凭证填充防护缺失
A08 - 数据完整性失败
- 反序列化漏洞
- 未签名的更新/插件
- CI/CD 管道安全
- 代码注入(include/require 用户输入)
A09 - 日志与监控失败
- 安全事件未记录
- 日志包含敏感信息
- 缺失告警机制
- 日志可篡改
A10 - 服务端请求伪造(SSRF)
- 用户输入直接用于 URL 请求
- 内网访问未限制
- 协议白名单缺失
- DNS 重绑定
2. 依赖漏洞扫描
- 检查 package.json / pom.xml / requirements.txt 依赖版本
- 比对 CVE 数据库
- 评估漏洞可利用性(CVSS 评分)
- 生成升级建议
3. 敏感信息检测
- 硬编码密钥(API Key、Token、Password)
- 日志中的敏感数据
- 配置文件中的明文凭证
- Git 历史中的敏感信息
漏洞等级标准
| 等级 | CVSS | 含义 | 处理时效 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Critical | 9.0-10.0 | 立即修复(RCE、数据泄露) | 24 小时内 |
| 🟠 High | 7.0-8.9 | 尽快修复(注入、越权) | 7 天内 |
| 🟡 Medium | 4.0-6.9 | 计划修复(信息泄露) | 30 天内 |
| 🔵 Low | 0.1-3.9 | 评估修复(配置优化) | 下个版本 |
输出格式
【安全审计报告】
## 1. 审计概览
审计范围:[文件/模块/项目]
审计时间:YYYY-MM-DD
总体安全评级:A/B/C/D/F
漏洞统计:Critical=N, High=N, Medium=N, Low=N
## 2. 漏洞详情
### 🔴 Critical
[V-001] [漏洞名称]
类型:OWASP A0X - [类别]
位置:file.ext:LXX
描述:...
影响:...
CVE:CVE-2024-XXXX(如适用)
CVSS:X.X
修复方案:
1. ...
2. ...
参考标准:...
### 🟠 High
[V-002] ...
### 🟡 Medium
[V-003] ...
### 🔵 Low
[V-004] ...
## 3. 依赖漏洞
| 依赖 | 当前版本 | 漏洞版本 | CVE | CVSS | 建议版本 |
|------|----------|----------|-----|------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## 4. 敏感信息检测
| # | 类型 | 位置 | 风险 | 处理建议 |
|---|------|------|------|----------|
| 1 | 硬编码 API Key | file.ext:LXX | 高 | 移至环境变量 |
## 5. 安全配置检查
| 检查项 | 状态 | 建议 |
|--------|------|------|
| HTTPS 强制 | ✅/❌ | ... |
| CSP 头 | ✅/❌ | ... |
| HSTS | ✅/❌ | ... |
| 速率限制 | ✅/❌ | ... |
## 6. 审计结论
安全状态:✅ 通过 / ❌ 需修复后重新审计
合规状态:符合 / 不符合 [标准名]
优先修复项:V-001, V-002
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 179 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 41e36cba58c1
metago-security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,750 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
card-xiaohongshu
Xiaohongshu-style knowledge cards, arranged as a swipeable multi-card carousel.
extract
Run the full Semantica semantic extraction pipeline on a file or selected text — NER, relations, events, coreference resolution, triplets, and validation. Clears result cache before each run. Returns Markdown tables with entity/relation/event/triplet results and inline validator warnings.
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.
loop-orchestration
Reference loop-orchestration example; a local loop host chains governed runx turns through receipts, budgets, context, and stop policy.
deploy-registry-server-with-cnpg
Deploy the ToolHive Registry Server to a Kind cluster with CloudNativePG (CNPG) PostgreSQL database. Use when you need a production-like PostgreSQL setup with the CNPG operator.