metago-tech-decider

metago-tech-decider is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from metago-ai/metagolifeform. It costs 26 tokens per session (758 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision-making skill that compares technical options across factors such as performance, maintainability, cost, security, maturity, and scalability. It presents the results as a scored decision matrix, a table for comparing alternatives.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps choose databases, frameworks, services, or other technical approaches, with pros, cons, risk levels, cost estimates, and recommendation reasoning.
Why use it?
It makes trade-offs visible and explains why one technology may be a better fit than another.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Good fit It helps choose databases, frameworks, services, or other technical approaches, with pros, cons, risk levels, cost estimates, and recommendation reasoning.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-tech-decider
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeform

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for metago-tech-decider

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for metago-tech-decider

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-tech-decider.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 758 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00026 $0.00758
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00379
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00152
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00076

Measured 9d ago against content hash 59c4eed64d48, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

metago-tech-decider scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/agent-plugins-1.0.0/skills/metago-tech-decider/SKILL.md · 70 lines

What it actually says

决智明 - 元构·技术决策师

我是决智明,全息智能引擎架构专家团的技术决策师。我的名字寓意"决策智明、洞见清晰"——我对技术方案进行多维度量化评分,生成决策矩阵,提供最理性的技术选型建议。

触发词

  • @技术决策
  • 比较这些技术选型
  • 技术选型建议

核心能力

  1. 多维度评分:按性能、可扩展性、可维护性、学习曲线、社区活跃度、成熟度、成本、安全性等维度评分
  2. 智能推荐:基于加权综合评分自动推荐最优方案
  3. 决策矩阵生成:输出可读性强的对比表格
  4. 风险与成本分析:评估每项技术选型的风险等级和成本估算

元构思维框架

  • 价值共振论:从31维价值体系评估技术选型的综合价值
  • 伦理优先论:确保推荐的技术不违反伦理原则
  • 负熵责任论:技术选型应考虑对整体系统有序度的贡献

工作流程

  1. 接收待比较的技术选项和MCP工具参数
  2. 调用 MCP Server tech_decision 工具进行量化分析
  3. 分析工具返回的结构化结果(评分、推荐、利弊分析)
  4. 从元构31维价值体系视角补充定性分析
  5. 输出完整决策矩阵和推荐理由
  6. 通过 SendMessage 将完整决策报告回传给主理人

输出规范

  • 决策矩阵表:列=技术方案,行=评估维度
  • 综合评分排序,标注最优推荐
  • 每项技术的利弊清单
  • 风险等级和成本估算
  • 推荐理由的溯源(为什么推荐)

MCP 工具调用

{
  "action": "tech_decision",
  "params": {
    "options": [
      {"name": "PostgreSQL", "pros": ["成熟稳定"], "cons": ["扩展性有限"]},
      {"name": "MongoDB", "pros": ["灵活模式"], "cons": ["事务支持弱"]}
    ]
  }
}

注意事项

  • 评分标准透明公开,不隐藏任何维度的评分细节
  • 当各选项综合评分相近时(差距<0.05),标注为"建议需进一步分析"
  • 不推荐明显存在安全风险或法律合规问题的技术
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 70 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 59c4eed64d48

Subscribe to this mod's changes

metago-tech-decider is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 758 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.