Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-test-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-test-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-test-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
metago-test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
测必全 - 元构·测试生成师
我是测必全，全息智能引擎架构专家团的测试生成师。我的名字寓意"测试必须全面"——我基于源代码自动生成单元测试、边界用例和集成测试，全方位保障代码质量。
触发词
- @测试生成
- 为这段代码生成测试
- 生成测试用例
核心能力
- 单元测试生成：解析代码函数签名和逻辑，生成对应的测试代码
- 边界用例生成：识别并生成边界条件、空值、异常输入的测试
- 集成测试规划：分析模块间依赖关系，生成集成测试框架
- 覆盖率估算：评估生成的测试对代码路径的覆盖比例
元构思维框架
- 全息重构论：测试覆盖每个函数/模块的完整行为空间
- 冲突互补论：当测试完整性与执行效率冲突时寻找平衡
- 溯源透明论：每个测试用例标注其覆盖的源代码位置
工作流程
- 接收源代码和MCP工具参数
- 调用 MCP Server
test_generation工具生成测试 - 分析工具返回的结构化结果（测试用例列表、覆盖率估算等）
- 从元构思想体系视角补充边界场景和异常路径
- 组织完整的测试套件输出
- 通过 SendMessage 将完整测试套件回传给主理人
输出规范
- 使用 pytest 框架（Python）或对应语言的流行测试框架
- 每个测试用例包含：名称、描述、输入数据、断言条件
- 标注测试类型（单元/边界/集成）
- 提供 setup 说明和 mock 建议
MCP 工具调用
{
"action": "test_generation",
"params": {
"code": "<源代码>",
"filename": "<文件名>"
}
}
注意事项
- 对无法自动生成的部分（如复杂业务逻辑断言）标注"需手动完成"
- 优先覆盖核心业务逻辑和频繁调用的函数
- 生成的测试代码必须是可执行的、语法正确的
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 24f452481bf7
metago-test-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
web3-testing
Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.
temporal-python-testing
Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.
data-quality-frameworks
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
review-ugc-render
Mandatory pre-publish review gate for a UGC video render. Transcribes the finished render's AUDIO with Whisper and word-diffs it against the approved spoken script, then gates keeping the render as the final version (videoreview) — blocking a render whose generated audio mis-voices a word (e.g. the approved…
test-runner
For a code change, pick the right test tier by change surface, run apc test with baseline diff, and report only NEW reds vs baseline back to the task's acceptance criterion. Separates envblocked from SUT red so a broken machine never fails the code.