Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-thought-05-policy-tractiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-05-policy-traction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-05-policy-traction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-05-policy-traction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-05-policy-traction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-05-policy-traction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00961 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00481 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
metago-thought-05-policy-traction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
政策牵引律 V4.0
描述
通过技术可行性、经济合理性、制度兼容性、政策导向性四维对齐评估，量化方案与政策环境的契合度，指导方案设计与政策风险防控。
触发条件
- 评估方案的政策合规性与落地可行性
- 政策风险分析与防控
- 方案需要政府/监管审批
- 需要论证方案的政策正当性
前置条件
- 明确的技术方案
- 可获取的相关政策文件与法规
元思想核心
四维对齐模型：
政策牵引力 P = T * E * I * D
| 维度 | 符号 | 评估内容 | 通过阈值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 技术可行性 | T | 方案技术路径是否成熟可实现 | T >= 0.6 |
| 经济合理性 | E | 方案投入产出比是否合理 | E >= 0.6 |
| 制度兼容性 | I | 方案是否与现行法规制度兼容 | I >= 0.7 |
| 政策导向性 | D | 方案是否符合当前政策导向 | D >= 0.7 |
关键特性：
- P 为乘法关系：任一维度为 0，整体牵引力为 0
- I 和 D 为硬约束（阈值更高），T 和 E 为软约束
- P >= 0.25 为可推进；P >= 0.5 为优先推进；P < 0.15 为高风险
政策窗口期：
W(t) = D(t) * Window(t)
政策导向性会随时间变化，需识别窗口期。
推理框架
步骤 1：技术可行性评估（T）
- 技术成熟度（TRL 1-9 级）
- 技术路径是否有验证案例
- T = TRL/9 * 验证度
步骤 2：经济合理性评估（E）
- 投入产出比分析
- 成本可承受性
- E = min(ROI合理性, 成本可承受性)
步骤 3：制度兼容性评估（I）
- 逐条比对现行法规
- 识别合规风险点
- I = 1 - 合规风险密度
步骤 4：政策导向性评估（D）
- 比对国家/行业政策文件
- 识别政策支持条款
- D = 政策支持度 * 导向匹配度
步骤 5：综合牵引力计算
- P = T * E * I * D
- 识别最薄弱维度（木桶效应）
- 评估政策窗口期 W(t)
步骤 6：优化策略
- 若 T 低：技术攻关或引入成熟方案
- 若 E 低：优化成本结构或扩大收益
- 若 I 低：调整方案设计规避合规风险
- 若 D 低：等待窗口期或调整方向
验证方法
- 四维评估是否有客观证据（非主观打分）
- T 评估是否参考了 TRL 标准或等效成熟度模型
- I 评估是否逐条比对了具体法规条款
- D 评估是否引用了具体政策文件
- P 计算是否正确（乘法关系）
- 最薄弱维度的识别是否准确
- 政策窗口期 W(t) 是否有时间维度分析
- 用已审批通过/被拒的方案回测：P 值排序是否与审批结果一致
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 95 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 0cb92323333e
metago-thought-05-policy-traction is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 961 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
vuln-disclosure
Prepare an evidence-bound vulnerability publication and publish the exact approved advisory through any compatible provider binding with independent readback.
contract-drafter
Draft a contract from a versioned template with explicit parties and terms, reconciling every clause against the rendered baseline deterministically and keeping delivery behind a human gate.
data-subject-request
Judge a data subject erasure or export request against explicit policy evidence, record the verdict durably through data-store, and emit only a bounded handoff for a separate governed downstream run.
interpret-results
Interprets AIR Blackbox scan results and maps findings to specific EU AI Act articles, recitals, and remediation steps. Use when the user has scan output and wants to understand what to fix, why it matters, or how to prioritize.
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.