Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-thought-06-socialist-couplinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00995 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
社会主义耦生哲学 V5.3.2
描述
将马克思主义中国化的核心价值与耦生智能范式融合，通过七维价值共振评估方案与社会主义价值体系的契合度，确保技术发展服务于共同富裕与社会公正。
触发条件
- 方案需要与中国社会主义核心价值观对齐
- 评估技术方案的社会效益与公平性
- 设计面向中国市场的产品/政策
- 需要论证方案的社会正当性
前置条件
- 明确的方案或产品
- 了解中国社会政策语境
元思想核心
七维价值共振模型：
价值共振度 R = (v1*v2*v3*v4*v5*v6*v7)^(1/7)
| 维度 | 符号 | 价值内涵 | 评估问题 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 共同富裕 | v1 | 是否促进财富普惠 | 方案是否扩大还是缩小贫富差距？ |
| 人民中心 | v2 | 是否以人民利益为根本 | 方案的服务对象是少数还是多数？ |
| 公平正义 | v3 | 是否保障机会公平 | 方案是否制造新的不平等？ |
| 集体主义 | v4 | 是否促进协同共赢 | 方案是零和博弈还是正和博弈？ |
| 科技向善 | v5 | 是否技术服务于善 | 方案是否有被滥用的风险？ |
| 生态文明 | v6 | 是否可持续 | 方案是否消耗未来资源？ |
| 共建共享 | v7 | 是否开放参与 | 方案是否允许广泛参与？ |
共振条件：
- R >= 0.7：价值共振，方案可推进
- 0.4 <= R < 0.7：部分共振，需补齐短板维度
- R < 0.4：价值不共振，需重新设计
耦生融合原则：
- 技术耦生不能违背社会公正
- 效率提升不能牺牲公平性
- 智能化不能加剧数字鸿沟
推理框架
步骤 1：七维逐项评估（0-1 分）
- v1 共同富裕：方案对财富分配的影响
- v2 人民中心：方案的服务覆盖面
- v3 公平正义：方案的机会公平性
- v4 集体主义：方案的协同共赢度
- v5 科技向善：方案的风险可控性
- v6 生态文明：方案的可持续性
- v7 共建共享：方案的参与开放性
步骤 2：共振度计算
- R = (v1v2v3v4v5v6v7)^(1/7)
- 几何平均意味着任一维度过低会严重拉低整体
步骤 3：短板识别
- 找出最低分维度
- 分析该维度低分的根因
步骤 4：价值优化
- 针对短板维度设计改进措施
- 确保改进措施不损害其他维度
步骤 5：耦生融合验证
- 验证技术耦生是否与社会公正一致
- 验证效率提升是否以公平为代价
- 验证智能化是否加剧数字鸿沟
验证方法
- 七维评估是否有具体证据（非抽象表态）
- R 计算是否正确（几何平均）
- 短板维度的根因分析是否到位
- 改进措施是否真的能提升短板而不损害其他维度
- 耦生融合三项验证是否全部通过
- 用已落地的中国语境方案回测：R 值与实际社会反响是否一致
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 9bde25c63bfa
metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
refund-page-generator
Deprecated compatibility entry for Refund Policy Page construction. This page is now maintained in Pagina; install and use page-builder to build a new Refund Policy Page.
disclosure-page-generator
Deprecated compatibility entry for Disclosure Page construction. This page is now maintained in Pagina; install and use page-builder to build a new Disclosure Page.
yuwen-publish-precheck
A Chinese-language review workflow for checking content before publishing it on Douyin, Xiaohongshu, or WeChat Channels.
email-lifecycle-send-check
Checks a drafted email flow or broadcast before it is loaded: flow logic and exits, overlaps, offer depth and codes, stock, claims, consent and legal footer, SMS rules, rendering, voice and AI-copy tells, and the goal metric. Returns a pass / fixed / open-question table. Use alone when you already have the finished…
make-static-ads-claims-extract
Step of the make-static-ads playbook: pulls every claim-bearing span out of an ad — the copy around the image, the on-image words in the prompt, badges, and what the picture implies — and keeps or cuts each by the brand-brain rule. Runs before spend on the finished prompt (Pass A) and on every render (Pass B). Run…
lov-china-website-filing
A workflow for preparing and launching websites in mainland China, including ICP filing and public-security filing. ICP filing is the registration required for many mainland websites, while public-security filing is a separate police registration.