Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-thought-06-socialist-couplinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
社会主义耦生哲学 V5.3.2
描述
将马克思主义中国化的核心价值与耦生智能范式融合，通过七维价值共振评估方案与社会主义价值体系的契合度，确保技术发展服务于共同富裕与社会公正。
触发条件
- 方案需要与中国社会主义核心价值观对齐
- 评估技术方案的社会效益与公平性
- 设计面向中国市场的产品/政策
- 需要论证方案的社会正当性
前置条件
- 明确的方案或产品
- 了解中国社会政策语境
元思想核心
七维价值共振模型：
价值共振度 R = (v1*v2*v3*v4*v5*v6*v7)^(1/7)
| 维度 | 符号 | 价值内涵 | 评估问题 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 共同富裕 | v1 | 是否促进财富普惠 | 方案是否扩大还是缩小贫富差距？ |
| 人民中心 | v2 | 是否以人民利益为根本 | 方案的服务对象是少数还是多数？ |
| 公平正义 | v3 | 是否保障机会公平 | 方案是否制造新的不平等？ |
| 集体主义 | v4 | 是否促进协同共赢 | 方案是零和博弈还是正和博弈？ |
| 科技向善 | v5 | 是否技术服务于善 | 方案是否有被滥用的风险？ |
| 生态文明 | v6 | 是否可持续 | 方案是否消耗未来资源？ |
| 共建共享 | v7 | 是否开放参与 | 方案是否允许广泛参与？ |
共振条件：
- R >= 0.7：价值共振，方案可推进
- 0.4 <= R < 0.7：部分共振，需补齐短板维度
- R < 0.4：价值不共振，需重新设计
耦生融合原则：
- 技术耦生不能违背社会公正
- 效率提升不能牺牲公平性
- 智能化不能加剧数字鸿沟
推理框架
步骤 1：七维逐项评估（0-1 分）
- v1 共同富裕：方案对财富分配的影响
- v2 人民中心：方案的服务覆盖面
- v3 公平正义：方案的机会公平性
- v4 集体主义：方案的协同共赢度
- v5 科技向善：方案的风险可控性
- v6 生态文明：方案的可持续性
- v7 共建共享：方案的参与开放性
步骤 2：共振度计算
- R = (v1v2v3v4v5v6v7)^(1/7)
- 几何平均意味着任一维度过低会严重拉低整体
步骤 3：短板识别
- 找出最低分维度
- 分析该维度低分的根因
步骤 4：价值优化
- 针对短板维度设计改进措施
- 确保改进措施不损害其他维度
步骤 5：耦生融合验证
- 验证技术耦生是否与社会公正一致
- 验证效率提升是否以公平为代价
- 验证智能化是否加剧数字鸿沟
验证方法
- 七维评估是否有具体证据（非抽象表态）
- R 计算是否正确（几何平均）
- 短板维度的根因分析是否到位
- 改进措施是否真的能提升短板而不损害其他维度
- 耦生融合三项验证是否全部通过
- 用已落地的中国语境方案回测：R 值与实际社会反响是否一致
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 90 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 9bde25c63bfa
metago-thought-06-socialist-coupling is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
vuln-disclosure
Prepare an evidence-bound vulnerability publication and publish the exact approved advisory through any compatible provider binding with independent readback.
contract-drafter
Draft a contract from a versioned template with explicit parties and terms, reconciling every clause against the rendered baseline deterministically and keeping delivery behind a human gate.
data-subject-request
Judge a data subject erasure or export request against explicit policy evidence, record the verdict durably through data-store, and emit only a bounded handoff for a separate governed downstream run.
interpret-results
Interprets AIR Blackbox scan results and maps findings to specific EU AI Act articles, recitals, and remediation steps. Use when the user has scan output and wants to understand what to fix, why it matters, or how to prioritize.
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.