Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-thought-15-origin-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-15-origin-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-15-origin-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-15-origin-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-15-origin-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-thought-15-origin-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00928 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
metago-thought-15-origin-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
创源计划框架 V5卷
描述
通过"溯源-重构-创造"三阶段路线图，为任何领域或项目提供从理解本源到创造新范式的系统化演进路径，指导长期技术演进与创新规划。
触发条件
- 制定项目或技术的长期路线图
- 规划从现状到目标的技术演进路径
- 设计创新路线
- 需要系统化的"从理解到创造"方法论
前置条件
- 明确的领域或项目
- 可考据的发展历史与现状
元思想核心
三阶段路线图：
溯源(Trace) -> 重构(Reconstruct) -> 创造(Create)
阶段一：溯源（Trace）
- 目标：理解事物的本源与演化逻辑
- 方法：历史考古、根因分析、第一性原理
- 产出：本源图谱、演化树、关键转折点
- 完成标志：能回答"它为什么是现在这样？"
阶段二：重构（Reconstruct）
- 目标：基于本源理解，重新构建更优的结构
- 方法：解构-重组、范式转移、架构重设计
- 产出：新架构、新模型、新流程
- 完成标志：新结构在效率/效果上显著优于旧结构
阶段三：创造（Create）
- 目标：在重构基础上创造全新范式
- 方法：跨域融合、从0到1创造、范式发明
- 产出：新范式、新理论、新物种
- 完成标志：创造了旧范式无法解释的新事物
阶段转换条件：
T1->T2: 溯源深度 D >= 0.8（理解本源）
T2->T3: 重构增益 G >= 2x（显著优于旧结构）
推理框架
步骤 1：溯源阶段规划
- 确定溯源范围（历史深度、领域广度）
- 执行五维溯源（时间/空间/因果/价值/意义）
- 评估溯源深度 D
- D >= 0.8 则进入重构
步骤 2：重构阶段规划
- 基于本源图谱识别旧结构的根本缺陷
- 设计新结构（架构/模型/流程）
- 评估重构增益 G = 新结构效能 / 旧结构效能
- G >= 2 则进入创造
步骤 3：创造阶段规划
- 识别重构后仍存在的根本性局限
- 设计跨域融合方案
- 定义新范式的核心特征
- 规划从0到1的创造路径
步骤 4：路线图整合
- 绘制三阶段时间线
- 标注阶段转换的里程碑
- 识别每阶段的关键风险
步骤 5：动态调整
- 定期评估当前阶段的完成度
- 根据进展调整阶段时间线
- 允许阶段间的迭代回溯
验证方法
- 溯源深度 D 是否有五维溯源的证据
- 重构增益 G 是否有量化对比
- 创造的新范式是否确实超出旧范式框架
- 阶段转换条件是否严格执行（非主观跳跃）
- 路线图是否有明确的时间线与里程碑
- 用已完成的创新案例回测：三阶段路径是否与实际一致
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A ae8c409ae0c9
metago-thought-15-origin-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 928 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
todo-for-ai-agent-runtime
Runtime integration skill for external agents connecting to Todo for AI over HTTP API Token / Agent Key, including auth, task lease, events, commit, and task logs.
karpathy-guidelines
Tool-agnostic behavioral guidelines for AI coding assistants. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring code to reduce overengineering, surface ambiguity, make surgical changes, and define verifiable success criteria.
pkf-writing
Author, update, convert, validate, persist, and render PKF (.pkf) content through message-inline, Library Asset, or Memory Page carriers. Use for structured reports, knowledge pages, delivery cards, or any .pkf body. NOT for recall, memory-graph placement, or curation decisions — those belong to the memory skill.
monorepo-management
Master monorepo management with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces to build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management. Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies.
loop-engineering
Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.