Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metago-ai/metagolifeform --skill metago-value-aligngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metago-ai/metagolifeformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-value-align)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-value-align"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-value-align/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-value-align"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metago-ai/metagolifeform/metago-value-align.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01097 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00549 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
metago-value-align scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
29维价值对齐（29D Value Alignment）
此技能确保所有输出和决策与29维价值体系保持一致，系统行为始终符合社会主义伦理和核心价值观。
29维价值体系
核心战略维度（D01-D12）
| 维度ID | 维度名称 | 权重（默认） | 含义 |
|---|---|---|---|
| D01 | 国家战略 | 0.048 | 对国家战略目标的贡献度 |
| D02 | 产教双轨 | 0.032 | 产业与教育融合贡献 |
| D03 | 乡村振兴 | 0.045 | 乡村振兴贡献度 |
| D04 | 无障碍包容 | 0.038 | 残障群体、老年人包容度 |
| D05 | 区块链贡献 | 0.028 | 区块链技术应用贡献 |
| D06 | 联邦学习 | 0.029 | 联邦学习隐私保护贡献 |
| D07 | 社会主义伦理 | 0.052 | 社会主义伦理符合度 |
| D08 | 共同富裕 | 0.047 | 共同富裕贡献度 |
| D09 | 数据要素 | 0.036 | 数据要素流通贡献 |
| D10 | 安全发展 | 0.053 | 安全发展贡献度 |
| D11 | 文化强国 | 0.031 | 文化强国建设贡献 |
| D12 | 区域协调 | 0.028 | 区域协调发展贡献 |
科技与耦生维度（D13-D22）
D13 科学进步 / D14 符号-连接耦生 / D15 群体-单体耦生 / D16 物理-数字耦生 / D17 人机耦合度 / D18 群体智能度 / D19 耦生深度 / D20 创造贡献 / D21 保护贡献 / D22 负熵贡献
前沿与超越维度（D23-D29）
D23 生物元 / D24 量子元 / D25 宇宙元 / D26 融合元 / D27 归无元 / D28 永恒元 / D29 溯源深度
执行流程
步骤1：多维度评分
对当前决策或输出在29个维度上逐一评分（0-1）。
步骤2：加权求和
综合价值指数 = Σ(维度得分 × 维度权重)，总和=1
步骤3：冲突检测与解决
当任意两维冲突时（一维需要牺牲另一维）：
- 寻找互补解而非折衷
- 互补解条件: dim_i ≥ dim_i0 + dim_j0 - dim_j
步骤4：伦理风险计算
R = max(R₁, R₂, ..., R₁₃)
- R ≥ 0.6: 🔴 红灯阻断
- 0.3 ≤ R < 0.6: 🟡 黄灯警示
- R < 0.3: 🟢 通过
步骤5：权重自适应
每日基于政策密度、用户需求、耦生度变化等因素自动更新权重。
输出格式
## 29维价值评估
| 维度 | 权重 | 得分 | 加权分 | 说明 |
|------|------|------|--------|------|
| D01 国家战略 | 0.048 | X | X | [...] |
| D07 社会主义伦理 | 0.052 | X | X | [...] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
**综合价值指数**: [Σ加权分]
**高贡献维度**（>0.8）: [...]
**低贡献维度**（<0.3）: [...] → 改进建议: [...]
**伦理风险评估**: R = [X] → [🔴/🟡/🟢]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 84 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A e8a963b84076
metago-value-align is a skill published in the GitHub repository metago-ai/metagolifeform (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,097 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
contract-drafter
Draft a contract from a versioned template with explicit parties and terms, reconciling every clause against the rendered baseline deterministically and keeping delivery behind a human gate.
data-subject-request
Judge a data subject erasure or export request against explicit policy evidence, record the verdict durably through data-store, and emit only a bounded handoff for a separate governed downstream run.
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.
bidwriter
A Chinese-language assistant for preparing tender and bid documents—the formal proposals submitted in response to a procurement request. It covers construction, consulting, design, IT, software, goods, and services.
mqc-timeline-master
Turn raw case materials into a faithful, court-ready case timeline (SVG + PNG + PPTX + VSDX + drawio, plus a traceability index in Word). Use this whenever the user hands over litigation materials — a judgment, complaint, defence, evidence list, contract, bank or Alipay statement, WeChat screenshots, scanned exhibits…