Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metaschema-framework/claude-plugins --skill oscal-profilegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metaschema-framework/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-profile)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-profile"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-profile.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01942 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00971 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00388 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
oscal-profile scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OSCAL Profile Model
The Profile model enables selecting, organizing, and tailoring controls from catalogs to create security baselines. Profiles can import from catalogs or other profiles.
Related skills:
oscal-catalog- Control definitions that profiles select fromoscal-ssp- System Security Plans that implement profile baselines
Purpose
A profile:
- Selects specific controls from source catalogs
- Tailors controls by modifying parameters, adding constraints, or supplementing guidance
- Organizes controls into custom groupings
- Creates baselines like FedRAMP Low/Moderate/High
Common Profiles
| Profile | Based On | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FedRAMP Low | NIST 800-53 | Low-impact cloud systems |
| FedRAMP Moderate | NIST 800-53 | Moderate-impact cloud systems |
| FedRAMP High | NIST 800-53 | High-impact cloud systems |
| CMMC Level 2 | NIST 800-171 | Contractor cybersecurity maturity |
Document Structure
profile:
uuid: <unique-identifier>
metadata:
title: "Baseline Profile"
version: "1.0.0"
oscal-version: "1.1.2"
imports: # Source catalogs/profiles
- href: "catalog.json"
include-controls:
- with-ids:
- ac-1
- ac-2
merge: # How to combine imports
combine:
method: merge
as-is: true
modify: # Tailoring modifications
set-parameters: []
alters: []
back-matter:
resources: []
Imports
Importing from Catalogs
imports:
- href: "https://example.com/oscal/nist-800-53-catalog.json"
include-controls:
- with-ids:
- ac-1
- ac-2
- ac-3
Importing from Other Profiles
imports:
- href: "fedramp-moderate-baseline.json"
include-controls:
- with-ids:
- ac-1
Include/Exclude Patterns
Include all controls:
imports:
- href: "catalog.json"
include-all: {}
Include by matching:
imports:
- href: "catalog.json"
include-controls:
- matching:
- pattern: "ac-*" # All access control
- pattern: "sc-*" # All system/comms protection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 288 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 4ae9f726cc4f
oscal-profile is a skill published in the GitHub repository metaschema-framework/claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,942 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…