Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metaschema-framework/claude-plugins --skill oscal-sspgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metaschema-framework/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-ssp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-ssp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metaschema-framework/claude-plugins/oscal-ssp.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01981 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00991 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
oscal-ssp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 354 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OSCAL System Security Plan (SSP) Model
The SSP model documents how an information system implements security controls from a specific baseline (profile). It's the core artifact for system authorization.
Related skills:
oscal-profile- Baselines that define required controlsoscal-component-definition- Reusable component implementationsoscal-assessment-plan- Planning assessments of SSPs
Purpose
A System Security Plan:
- Documents the system boundary, components, and architecture
- Describes control implementations for each required control
- Identifies responsible parties for security functions
- Supports authorization (e.g., FedRAMP ATO)
Document Structure
system-security-plan:
uuid: <unique-identifier>
metadata:
title: "System Name SSP"
version: "1.0.0"
oscal-version: "1.1.2"
import-profile:
href: "profile.json"
system-characteristics: {}
system-implementation: {}
control-implementation: {}
back-matter:
resources: []
Import Profile
Reference the baseline the system implements:
import-profile:
href: "https://example.com/fedramp-moderate-baseline.json"
System Characteristics
Basic Information
system-characteristics:
system-ids:
- identifier-type: https://fedramp.gov
id: "F1234567890"
system-name: "Enterprise Management System"
system-name-short: "EMS"
description: "Cloud-based enterprise management platform"
props:
- name: cloud-service-model
value: "saas"
- name: cloud-deployment-model
value: "public-cloud"
security-sensitivity-level: moderate
system-information:
information-types:
- uuid: info-type-uuid
title: "Administrative Information"
categorizations:
- system: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-60v2r1
information-type-ids:
- C.2.8.12
confidentiality-impact:
base: moderate
integrity-impact:
base: moderate
availability-impact:
base: low
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 354 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A d8d19a9bd331
oscal-ssp is a skill published in the GitHub repository metaschema-framework/claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,981 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…