Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add metraton/gaia --skill investigationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metraton/gaiaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/metraton/gaia/investigation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metraton/gaia/investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metraton/gaia/investigation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/metraton/gaia/investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/metraton/gaia/investigation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00576 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00231 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
investigation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Investigation
Investigate from cheapest authoritative context toward narrowly scoped live evidence. The purpose is both diagnosis and a reliable mutation forecast.
Evidence ladder
- Read the injected dispatch kernel --
# Your Contract(goal, role,project, thecan_readmenu) and# What I know about you. Do not re-derive facts it already supplies. - Pull what the goal needs from the substrate on demand -- none of it is
preloaded, and a coordinate in the goal (a contract id, a memory slug, a
brief) is an instruction to go read it. The verbs, their addressing, and the
workspace rule that decides whether they resolve are in
agent-protocol/read-map.md. Do not read Gaia's database directly. - Inspect the smallest relevant source files, tests, configuration, git diff, or runtime query. Prefer authoritative implementation over prose.
- Record each material source immediately in the contract:
files_checked,patterns_checked,commands_run,key_outputs, exact excerpts inverbatim_outputs, whatever your change reaches outside the file you were sent to incross_layer_impacts, and uncertainty inopen_gaps. When the finding needs a supporting file too large forverbatim_outputs(a full command dump, a rendered report), stage it under the canonical Gaia scratch directory (~/.gaia/scratch, never the workspace/client repo), named after the current turn'scontract_id(<agent_id>.<token>, bare or with one trailing extension) so Gaia's own retention rule can attribute and reclaim it once the contract closes, then deposit it as evidence through the contract's evidence clause -- seeagent-contract-handoff-- rather than leaving it as a loose file. - Two rules apply here, at two different levels, and they do not compete.
Entering this phase at all is
agent-protocol's phase-transition floor: the instant work becomes investigation, writework_phase=investigatingonce (or fold it into the first evidence write) -- that mark is not optional when this phase genuinely runs. WITHIN the phase, what else gets checkpointed is governed by value-at-risk, not a fixed list: write a finding the instant re-deriving it would cost more than recording it. A long synthesis that runs with no tool calls in between is the costliest case: checkpoint the gathered evidence and hypotheses before you start it (you cannot predict where it lands), then fill the conclusion the instant you reach it -- before composing the report that states it, not after. A one-file read that never reaches a costly-to-redo finding earns zero mid-turn checkpoints beyond the one phase mark; do not add ritual where nothing is at risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 92 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 98c617e7dbd0
investigation is a skill published in the GitHub repository metraton/gaia (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,153 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-team
A multi-reviewer code review process that checks a change from several specialist viewpoints and combines the results into one report. It can cover bugs, security, tests, dependencies, frontend behavior, and continuous-integration workflows.
ultra
Fans the work out as a fleet of parallel Grok and Codex agents billed to their own subscriptions, then synthesizes one result. The peer engine equivalent of ultracode, adding intensity without spending Claude quota on the fleet. Use it for genuinely broad goals, not only explicit asks for intensity.
grok-prompting
Brief writing guidance for composing self contained Grok briefs for coding, review, diagnosis, and second opinion tasks.
smoke
Runs a three probe live smoke wave after a plugin update and reports gate chain health before real work rides it.
codex-result-handling
Internal contract for returning Codex companion output without alteration.
shipwrights-loop
Drive multiple Jira tickets sequentially through the /shipwrights-epic pipeline. Auto-picks the next ticket, watches the PR until merged, transitions Jira to shipped, repeats. Resumable across Claude Code sessions via .shipwrights/loop-state.json. Invoked as /shipwrights-loop [N] | --status | --abort.