Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills --skill decision-frameworksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills/decision-frameworks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills/decision-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills/decision-frameworks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills/decision-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills/decision-frameworks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.01124 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00562 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
decision-frameworks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Decision Frameworks
Structured decision-making for founders using reversibility analysis, weighted scoring, pre-mortems, and second-order thinking.
Purpose
Founders make hundreds of decisions a week. Most should be fast. Some need structure. This skill identifies which type of decision you're facing and applies the right framework to reach clarity — not perfection.
Workflow
Step 1: Classify the Decision
Ask the user to describe the decision, then classify it:
Type 1 (Irreversible / High-stakes):
- Hard or impossible to undo
- Large financial, team, or strategic impact
- Examples: Hiring a co-founder, taking funding, pivoting the business, signing a lease
- Treatment: Slow down. Use full framework. Get more data.
Type 2 (Reversible / Low-stakes):
- Easy to undo or change course
- Limited blast radius
- Examples: Choosing a tool, testing a marketing channel, pricing experiment
- Treatment: Decide fast. Run the experiment. Don't overthink.
Tell the user which type they're dealing with.
Step 2: Select Framework
For Type 1 decisions — use Weighted Scoring + Pre-mortem:
Weighted Scoring Matrix:
- List the options (2-5)
- Define criteria that matter (3-7 criteria)
- Weight each criterion (must sum to 100%)
- Score each option per criterion (1-10)
- Calculate weighted totals
| Criteria | Weight | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Criterion 1] | 30% | 7 (2.1) | 5 (1.5) | 8 (2.4) |
| [Criterion 2] | 25% | 6 (1.5) | 8 (2.0) | 4 (1.0) |
| ... | ||||
| Total | 100% | X.X | X.X | X.X |
Pre-mortem: After the scoring, run a pre-mortem on the top option:
- "It's 12 months from now and this decision was a disaster. What went wrong?"
- List 3-5 failure scenarios
- For each: How likely? How preventable? What's the mitigation?
For Type 2 decisions — use 10/10/10 + Regret Minimization:
10/10/10 Rule:
- How will I feel about this in 10 minutes?
- How will I feel in 10 months?
- How will I feel in 10 years?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 136 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A fc74f6ae60e1
decision-frameworks is a skill published in the GitHub repository mfwarren/entrepreneur-claude-skills (67 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 1,124 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
modelchk
Size a task's run before spending it: the cheapest sufficient capability tier (fast, standard, frontier) and the reasoning effort within it, on a neutral scale that binds to whatever levels the model exposes. Use when work seems over- or under-powered, costly, ambiguous, or high-risk, or asks which model class and how…
re0-loop
Run repeated build -> QA -> re0-memo -> re0-work cycles while preserving learning and letting code die. Use for long agentic projects where progress must be measured by quality-cleared templates, reusable modules, and eliminated anti-patterns rather than hours spent or features accumulated.
autobahn
Carve guardrail-adjacent items out of scope with safe alternatives before risk-adjacent work starts, then run the safe remainder at full strength in a fresh subagent that only ever sees the carved prompt, never the risky input. Use when a task includes stealth, scraping, privacy, IP, policy, licensing, security, or…
re0-release
Walk a pending change through this repo's shipping and releasing checklist end to end, then tag and publish once confirmed. User-invoked: run it when you've decided to ship.
ssotize
Audit and consolidate a fact that's scattered across places into one canonical source, after approval, and replace the rest with references. Use when asked to find duplication, check consistency, locate the source of truth, deduplicate, consolidate, unify, or establish SSOT across artifacts or platforms. Starts…
re0-plan
Open a paperthin iteration's casebook before re0-loop's first turn — seeded with real content the moment the folder exists, never an empty directory. User-invoked, paperthin-only: assumes the full skill package installed. Run when opening a new build cycle in this repo.