Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MH4GF/claude-code --skill deslopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MH4GF/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/deslop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/deslop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/deslop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00624 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00250 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
deslop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Deslop
origin/main との diff を読み、AI 生成コードに紛れがちなパターンを検出して指摘する。ファイル編集は行わない。修正判断は呼び出し元に委ねる。
検出対象
- 周辺コードのスタイルと一致しない不要なコメント
- 信頼できる内部パスでの過剰な try/catch・防御チェック
- 型エラー回避だけが目的の
anyキャスト - 早期リターンで平坦化できる深いネスト
- ファイル全体の慣習と乖離した書き方
- 経緯を述べるコメント・文章。「以前は」「旧方式」「〜に変更した」「(#123 参照)」のような変更の物語や参照だけでなく、整った文で書かれた経緯も含む。判定は
~/.claude/CLAUDE.mdの「コメントと文書」節に従う。推奨書き換えは現状を述べる 1 文にする
対象ファイル
コードに限らず、diff に含まれる markdown・設定ファイルのコメントも見る
手順
- ベースブランチを判定する（既定:
origin/main、無ければorigin/master） git diff <base>...HEADで変更内容を取得する- 検出対象に該当する箇所をファイルパス・行番号付きでリスト化する
- 各指摘に「なぜノイズか」と「推奨書き換え」を 1〜2 行で添える
出力フォーマット
## Deslop 指摘
- <path>:<line> — <カテゴリ> — <推奨書き換え>
...
## サマリ
<1〜3 文。検出ゼロなら「該当なし」とだけ書く>
ガードレール
- 振る舞いが変わる可能性のある指摘は明示的にフラグを立てる
- 大規模な書き換え提案は出さない。最小・局所修正のみ
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +5 lines 6d6f06f6d5c2
- 2mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 6ae5c4009658
deslop is a skill published in the GitHub repository MH4GF/claude-code (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 624 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…