Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MH4GF/claude-code --skill difit-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MH4GF/claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/difit-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/difit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mh4gf/claude-code/difit-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00739 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
difit-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Difit Review
Overview
This skill launches a requested git diff in a viewer that is easy for humans to read. At the same time, the agent can attach arbitrary comments via the --comment option.
This comment mechanism is well suited for code review findings and code explanations.
Before running commands, choose <difit-command> using the following rule:
- If
command -v difitsucceeds, usedifit. - Otherwise, use
npx difit. - If falling back to
npx difitwould require network access in a sandboxed environment without network permission, request escalated permissions and user approval before running it.
Steps
The final command typically looks like this:
<difit-command> <target> [compare-with] \
--comment '{"type":"thread","filePath":"src/foobar.ts","position":{"side":"old","line":102},"body":"line 1\nline 2"}' \
--comment '{"type":"thread","filePath":"src/example.ts","position":{"side":"new","line":{"start":36,"end":39}},"body":"Range comment for L36-L39"}'
The detailed procedure is as follows.
- Identify the target diff and review its contents.
- Inspect the diff specified by the user. This may be a local git revision, a GitHub URL, a patch file, or something similar.
- Understand the diff normally, inspect surrounding code when needed, and think through the response required by the user's request, whether that is review findings, explanations, or something else.
- For PR reviews, inspect the PR locally and keep the review result limited to difit output. Do not post comments back to remote GitHub.
- Attach the prepared comments and launch difit.
- difit launch options
- Use
<difit-command> <target> [compare-with]to specify the target diff. - For uncommitted changes use
<difit-command> ., for working tree changes use<difit-command> working, and for staged changes use<difit-command> staging. - For stdin input, use a form such as
diff -u file1.txt file2.txt | <difit-command>.
- Use
- Comment arguments
- Use
type: "thread"for each comment. - Write comment bodies in the language the user is using.
- Use
position.side: "new"for lines that exist on the target side of the diff. - Use
position.side: "old"for lines that exist only on the deleted side. - Use range comments for issues that span multiple lines.
- Never copy secrets, tokens, passwords, API keys, private keys, or other credential-like material from the diff into
--commentbodies or any command-line arguments.
- Use
- Additional argument for files not yet added to git
- For uncommitted changes, if you decide files not yet added to git should also appear in the diff, add
--include-untracked.
- For uncommitted changes, if you decide files not yet added to git should also appear in the diff, add
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 55 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 778555921c3d
difit-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository MH4GF/claude-code (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 739 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.