Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mhrsdev/AI-Agent-Skills-Library --skill request-refactor-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mhrsdev/AI-Agent-Skills-LibraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhrsdev/ai-agent-skills-library/request-refactor-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhrsdev/ai-agent-skills-library/request-refactor-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhrsdev/ai-agent-skills-library/request-refactor-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
request-refactor-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to request-refactor-plan — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.
-
Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.
-
Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.
-
Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.
-
Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.
-
Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.
-
Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.
-
Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."
-
Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:
Problem Statement
The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.
Solution
The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.
Commits
A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.
Decision Document
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
- The modules that will be built/modified
- The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
- Technical clarifications from the developer
- Architectural decisions
- Schema changes
- API contracts
- Specific interactions
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
Testing Decisions
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 69 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A d59de4ba6cc1
request-refactor-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository mhrsdev/AI-Agent-Skills-Library (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to request-refactor-plan, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-security-hooks
Install and maintain defensive security hooks and CI gates for authorized SaaS projects. Use when asked to add pre-commit hooks, pre-push hooks, CI security scans, GitHub Actions hardening, secret scanning, dependency scanning, SAST, DAST gates, or security automation around existing repositories.
skill-release-engineering
Prepara releases seguros com changelog, migrações, smoke tests, rollback, feature flags, CI e checklist operacional.
finalize-phase
Completes feature/epic workflows after deployment with comprehensive walkthrough generation for epics (v5.0+), roadmap updates, artifact archival, documentation, and branch cleanup. Use after /ship-prod, /deploy-prod, or /build-local completes, or when user asks to finalize. (project).
git-workflow-enforcer
Enforce git commits after every phase and task to enable rollback and prevent lost work. Auto-trigger when completing phases, tasks, or when detecting uncommitted changes. Auto-commit with Conventional Commits format. Verify branch safety, check for merge conflicts, enforce clean working tree. Block completion if…
production-deployment-phase
Executes production deployment workflow by promoting validated staging builds to production with semantic versioning, health checks, and release tagging. Use when running /ship-prod command, deploying to production after staging validation, or promoting staging builds to production environment.
x-announcement
Post release announcements to X (Twitter) with automated GitHub link reply. Auto-trigger after /release command completion or manual invocation. Generates engaging posts from CHANGELOG, posts via API, and replies with GitHub release link in threaded format.