team-implement-plan-full

team-implement-plan-full is a skill for Claude Code from mhylle/claude-skills-collection. It costs 91 tokens per session (3,573 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A full implementation team that assigns one coding agent to each independent plan phase and runs compatible phases at the same time. A shared reviewer checks the completed work across phases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for plans with four or more phases, especially when phases span different parts of a system and some can proceed independently. It implements phases in dependency-based waves and reviews cross-phase consistency.
Why use it?
It shortens the time needed for large plans with separate work streams while still checking that the resulting changes fit together.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Part of the devflow plugin — 38 skills, 13 agents, 5 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it for plans with four or more phases, especially when phases span different parts of a system and some can proceed independently. It implements phases in dependency-based waves and reviews cross-phase consistency.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill team-implement-plan-full
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install devflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 38 skills, 13 agents, 5 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for team-implement-plan-full

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for team-implement-plan-full

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mhylle/claude-skills-collection/team-implement-plan-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 91 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,573 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00091 $0.03573
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.01786
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00715
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00357

Measured 12d ago against content hash e8d11d117a14, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

team-implement-plan-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/team-implement-plan-full/SKILL.md · 447 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 447 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Team Implement Plan Full (Large Team)

Overview

This skill executes implementation plans with maximum parallelism. Each phase gets a dedicated implementer teammate. Independent phases run simultaneously within waves. A shared Reviewer provides cross-phase quality checks.

Team composition:

  • phase-N-impl (one per phase in current wave): Implements their phase directly
  • reviewer: Shared across all phases. Reviews FIFO as phases complete. Checks cross-phase consistency
  • Lead: Orchestrates waves, manages team lifecycle, handles plan sync and completion

When to use this:

  • Plans with 4+ phases where some phases are independent
  • Large features spanning multiple modules/layers
  • When speed of execution matters and you can afford the token cost

Token cost: ~100-150K per wave (scales with concurrent implementers)

References:

  • references/team-lifecycle.md for team lifecycle pattern
  • references/quality-pipeline-distribution.md for pipeline distribution

Initial Response

When invoked with a plan path:

"I'll set up a full implementation team with parallel execution. Let me read the plan, analyze the dependency graph, and present the execution waves before starting."

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Analysis

Step 1a: Read and validate the plan

Read($0)  # Plan path from argument

Validate:

  • Implementation phases with objectives and tasks
  • Exit conditions per phase
  • Dependencies between phases (from TaskList or plan structure)

Step 1b: Check existing progress

TaskList  # Check for existing tasks

If tasks exist with some completed, resume from current state (skip completed phases, adjust waves).

Step 1c: Build dependency graph

Parse phase dependencies to build execution waves:

Algorithm:
1. Read all tasks and their blockedBy relationships
2. Wave 1 = phases with no dependencies (blockedBy is empty)
3. Wave 2 = phases whose ALL dependencies are in Wave 1
4. Wave N = phases whose ALL dependencies are in Waves 1..N-1
5. Apply file conflict detection (Step 1d)

Read the full file on GitHub · 447 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 447 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A e8d11d117a14

Subscribe to this mod's changes

team-implement-plan-full is a skill published in the GitHub repository mhylle/claude-skills-collection (18 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 3,573 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens