Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Miaoge-Ge/coding-agent-skills --skill software-architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Miaoge-Ge/coding-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miaoge-ge/coding-agent-skills/software-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miaoge-ge/coding-agent-skills/software-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miaoge-ge/coding-agent-skills/software-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miaoge-ge/coding-agent-skills/software-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miaoge-ge/coding-agent-skills/software-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01747 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00699 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
software-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Software Architecture Design
Description
Provide system architecture design proposals, technology stack recommendations, and architecture tradeoff analysis to ensure solutions meet business requirements and non-functional requirements.
When to Use
- User requests "design architecture for XX system" or "help me choose tech stack"
- User asks about system scalability, high availability, or performance optimization strategies
- User needs microservices decomposition, module partitioning, or service boundary design
- User requests architecture review or refactoring proposal
- User asks how to apply architectural theories (CAP theorem, consistency models, distributed transactions) to specific scenarios
- User compares different architecture patterns or technology stacks
When NOT to Use
- User only needs specific code implementation or programming tips without architectural decisions
- User's problem is a pure algorithm or data structure implementation
- User needs UI/UX design rather than system architecture
- User only asks how to use a framework or library without system-level design
- User's project is extremely small (e.g., personal script, single-file tool) and doesn't require architecture
Input
{
requirements: {
businessScenario: string // Business scenario description
userScale?: string // User scale (e.g., "1M DAU")
qps?: string // Query/Request volume (e.g., "1000 QPS peak")
dataVolume?: string // Data volume (e.g., "10TB historical data")
latencyRequirement?: string // Latency requirement (e.g., "p99 < 100ms")
readWriteRatio?: string // Read/Write ratio (e.g., "read:write = 9:1")
consistencyRequirement?: string // Consistency (strong/eventual/causal)
}
constraints: {
budget?: string // Budget constraints
teamSize?: string // Team size and skill set
timeline?: string // Delivery timeline
existingTechStack?: string[] // Existing technology stack
complianceRequirements?: string // Compliance (e.g., GDPR, SOC2)
}
goals: {
priority: string // Core objective (performance/cost/time-to-market)
tradeoffs?: string // Known tradeoff preferences
}
existingArchitecture?: string // Existing architecture (for review/refactoring)
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 173 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 851b3e0d6674
software-architect is a skill published in the GitHub repository Miaoge-Ge/coding-agent-skills (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,747 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says. Use when editing or reviewing prose for AI tells: not-X-but-Y contrasts, one-line closers, staged openers, forced triads, dashes everywhere, inflated claims, sales language, stock AI words, bold labels, or filler. Based on Wikipedia's…
Cursor Skill (.mdc) Authoring
Author effective Cursor rules in .cursor/rules/.mdc - YAML frontmatter (description, globs, alwaysApply), the four rule types, scoped QA rules, subagents, and structure that actually steers the model.
audit
Audits recent work against its Definition of Done and project patterns. Runs the test suite, compares code against the spec, and reports PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL. Also runs the Critical Gate — a safety scan of the diff for destructive or dangerous operations. Generates an incremental prompt pack for any gaps found. With…
hotfix
Fixes an observed defect with reproducible evidence in one call: writes a short trace doc before touching code, implements the fix, and backs it with a regression test written before the fix. Production incidents are the motivating case, not a gate. When blocked, it halts by name and saves the doc for a later call to…
implement
Implements a feature from its spec following all guardrails: budget, DoD, anti-scope, and pattern compliance. Runs an 8-phase pipeline (find spec → extract guardrails → load patterns → plan → implement → test → refine → self-verify DoD). Use after gen-spec when you're ready to code. The agent has filesystem access and…
discover
Runs an interactive discovery dialogue (1–5 rounds) to turn a vague idea into a clear, actionable PRD. Challenges assumptions, cuts scope, and forces decisions. Saves the PRD to .vibeflow/prds/. Use before gen-spec when the idea is not yet well-defined or requirements are unclear.