Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal --skill auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MichaelYcJo/SpecSealWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00500 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
audit, the rules this repo wrote down for itself
A linter enforces what every project agrees on. This checks what only this
project agreed on, declared as .claude/audit-rules/*.md. A rule with no
file behind it is not a rule; if the directory is empty, say so rather than
inventing conventions.
How It Works
- Check for rules: look for
.claude/audit-rules/*.mdfiles. - If no rules exist: suggest bootstrapping with common patterns.
- If rules exist: validate each rule against the codebase.
Rule File Format
Each .claude/audit-rules/[name].md defines:
- Pattern: what to check (a regex, a file pattern, or a description)
- Expected: what should be true
- Severity:
critical,warningorinfo
Common starting rules
Nothing here runs on its own. These are what to propose when
.claude/audit-rules/ is empty (step 2), and each one becomes a rule only once
it is written as a file:
- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- No
console.login production code (unless a logging library wraps it) - No TODO or FIXME in the code being committed
Managing rules
There is no audit command to run. A rule is a file, so adding one means
writing .claude/audit-rules/<name>.md, listing them means reading that
directory, and removing one means deleting the file.
Output Format
## Audit Results
passed: [N] rules
warnings: [N]
violations: [N]
[For each violation:]
violation: [rule name], severity: [severity]
[file:line] [what's wrong]
Fix: [suggestion]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed bad7bcf83076
- 12d ago Changed 7d80a0a0a544
- 2mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 6723926ab60b
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
critical-code-reviewer
Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
pr-review
Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…
pr-review
Use when the user wants to deeply review a pull/merge request or a local diff — "review this PR", "grill the MR", "stress-test this diff", "deep-dive code review", "code review before merge", or when they name a PR/MR URL, number, branch, commit range (A..B/A...B), tag or SHA. Works on GitHub (gh), GitLab (glab), or a…
genshijin-review
A compact pull-request review format that writes one actionable finding per line in Japanese or English.
skill-distiller
Fetches top-rated skills from skills.sh, analyzes them, and synthesizes one token-efficient skill combining the best elements. Use when the user asks to "distill skills for X", "find and combine skills for X", "synthesize skills", "merge skills", "make a skill for X from skills.sh", "update distilled skill", or…