Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal --skill auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MichaelYcJo/SpecSealWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michaelycjo/specseal/audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
audit — the rules this repo wrote down for itself
A linter enforces what every project agrees on. This checks what only this
project agreed on, declared as .claude/audit-rules/*.md. A rule with no
file behind it is not a rule; if the directory is empty, say so rather than
inventing conventions.
How It Works
- Check for rules: Look for
.claude/audit-rules/*.mdfiles - If no rules exist: Suggest bootstrapping with common patterns
- If rules exist: Validate each rule against the codebase
Rule File Format
Each .claude/audit-rules/[name].md defines:
- Pattern: What to check (regex, file pattern, or description)
- Expected: What should be true
- Severity: critical / warning / info
Common starting rules
Nothing here runs on its own. These are what to propose when
.claude/audit-rules/ is empty (step 2), and each one becomes a rule only once
it is written as a file:
- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- No
console.login production code (unless a logging library wraps it) - No TODO/FIXME in the code being committed
Managing rules
There is no audit command to run. A rule is a file, so adding one means
writing .claude/audit-rules/<name>.md, listing them means reading that
directory, and removing one means deleting the file.
Output Format
## Audit Results
✅ Passed: [N] rules
⚠️ Warnings: [N]
❌ Violations: [N]
[For each violation:]
❌ [rule name] - [severity]
[file:line] [what's wrong]
Fix: [suggestion]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 62 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 6723926ab60b
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 499 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.