Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/michaelycjo/specseal/testingnpx skills add MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MichaelYcJo/SpecSealWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00563 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/specseal:testing — put each test where it can actually fail
Coverage counts what ran, not what was checked, so a suite can be green and prove nothing. Two questions decide the shape: at which level can this break be observed, and would the test fail if the behavior changed.
The pyramid below is general; its middle tier is where projects differ most, so read the examples as one filling. What sits there is whatever this project's parts have to agree on to work — a service's database and request handlers, a client's screens against a fake backend, a CLI's argument parsing through to its exit codes, a library's public surface against a real consumer, a pipeline's stages against fixture data.
Test Pyramid
Unit Tests (base - most tests here)
- Pure functions, business logic
- Fast, isolated, no external deps
- Mock at boundaries only
Integration Tests (middle)
- Component interactions — the seams this project actually has
- Real collaborators where the seam is the point (a test database or container, a fake server, a temp filesystem, a simulator)
- Examples by project kind: database queries and request handlers; a screen driven against a stubbed API; argument parsing through to exit codes; a library exercised the way a caller would
E2E Tests (top - fewest tests here)
- Critical user flows only
- Login, checkout, core workflows
- Slower, run less frequently
Test Quality Checklist
- Tests have descriptive names (should_X_when_Y)
- Each test checks ONE thing
- Tests are independent (no ordering dependency)
- Tests cover happy path AND edge cases
- Tests cover error paths
- No test logic complexity (no if/loops in tests)
- Assertions are specific (not just "no error")
Rules
- Write failing test BEFORE fixing bugs
- Don't test implementation details, test behavior
- Don't mock what you don't own (wrap it instead)
- Keep tests fast (seconds, not minutes)
- Coverage target: focus on critical paths, not percentages
Output
## Test Strategy: [scope]
**Coverage Gaps**: [what's not tested]
**Priority Tests**: [what to add first]
**Test Plan**:
1. [test description] - [type: unit/integration/e2e]
2. ...
[Generated test code if requested]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 69 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 4461c6c6f4bd
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository MichaelYcJo/SpecSeal (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 563 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-audit-milestone
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving.
spec-kitty-charter-doctrine
Run charter interview, generation, context, and sync workflows for project governance in Spec Kitty 3.x. Access doctrine artifacts programmatically via DoctrineService. Resolve agent profiles. Load action-scoped governance context iteratively, not all at once. Triggers: "interview for charter", "generate charter"…
spec-kitty-spdd-reasons
Drive REASONS Canvas authoring and review for Spec Kitty missions that opted in to Structured-Prompt-Driven Development (SPDD) via charter selection. Triggers: "use SPDD", "use REASONS", "generate a REASONS canvas", "apply structured prompt driven development", "make this mission SPDD". Does NOT handle: enforcing SPDD…
conductor-implement
Executes the tasks defined in the specified track's plan. Use this to start or continue working on a feature, bug fix, or chore.
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…
dependency-upgrade
Plan, batch, and verify dependency upgrades safely. Triages outdated packages into risk tiers, upgrades in order (dev/minor/patch first, runtime majors last), verifies each batch, and produces an auditable commit sequence. Use when asked to "upgrade deps", "bump packages", "update nodemodules", "fix vulnerabilities"…