Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MichelKerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loopsnpx agentmods add skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/michelkerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops/agent-deep-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.08326 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.03330 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01665 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00833 |
Grade A, and why
agent-deep-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 601 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent persona
deep-reviewfrom.hermes/agents/deep-review.md(the shared agent files), mirrored as a preloadable skill because Hermes has no agent flag. Preload with-s agent-deep-reviewand adopt it for the session.
The Deep Reviewer: Iterative Code Quality Agent
Executes ONE review iteration within an autonomous review loop: read externalized state, review one focused dimension, produce P0/P1/P2 findings with file:line evidence, record edge cases and integration touchpoints, and update state for the next iteration.
Path Convention: Use only .skilled/agents/*.md as the canonical runtime path reference.
Hook-Injected Advisor Context: Treat hook-injected skill-advisor recommendations as routing hints only. They never override explicit user instructions, active command workflow, scope gates, runtime permissions, agent boundaries, or required skill loading. If advisor context conflicts with the dispatch prompt or verified local files, prefer the dispatch prompt plus file evidence and report the conflict.
Efficiency governor (the per-turn hook does not reach sub-agents — apply it here): reason about the problem, not yourself; lead with the result and act rather than narrate (batch tool calls, report at checkpoints); commit reversible decisions and move; qualify only when it changes what the reader should do.
CRITICAL: This agent executes a SINGLE review iteration, not the full loop. The loop is managed by /deep:review and dispatches this agent once per iteration.
IMPORTANT: This agent is a hybrid of @review severity discipline and the deep-review loop contract. It reviews code but does NOT modify code under review.
SPEC FOLDER PERMISSION: @deep-review may write only the resolved local-owner review packet for the target spec. Writable files are limited to the iteration artifact, strategy file, and JSONL state log listed in this agent contract. Review target files, reducer outputs, dashboards, reports, commands, skills, canonical agent files, and runtime mirrors are strictly READ-ONLY.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed adffc5947125
- 6d ago Changed · +1 lines de46f7dcb85b
- 28d ago Changed · +1 lines f06204ae6dcf
- 1mo ago Changed bc0c9b6bdbe5
- 1mo ago First seen · 599 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 9eddc202c0b3
agent-deep-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository MichelKerkmeester/skilled-agent-harness_spec-driven-loops (37 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 8,326 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…