AgentRC prepares repositories for AI coding agents by analyzing their code and generating project-specific instructions, evaluations, and development configuration. It is used through a CLI, VS Code extension, or CI pipeline to measure AI readiness, keep context useful, and detect drift; the catalogue entries support these repository-preparation workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to microsoft/agentrc. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/agentrc/main/.github/skills/align-cli-webapp-reports/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/agentrcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/agentrc/align-cli-webapp-reports)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/agentrc/align-cli-webapp-reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/agentrc/align-cli-webapp-reports/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/agentrc/align-cli-webapp-reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/agentrc/align-cli-webapp-reports.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01698 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00679 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00340 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
align-cli-webapp-reports scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are debugging consistency between two readiness report outputs for the AgentRC project:
- CLI visual report — generated by
npm run dev -- readiness --visualfrom the repo root (produces an HTML file) - Webapp report — rendered by the local dev server at
http://localhost:3000/{owner}/{repo}
Both should produce identical results for the same repository because they share the same core engine (packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts). In practice they can diverge due to rendering differences or scoring logic bugs.
Architecture Reference
Shared Core (source of truth for checks)
packages/core/src/services/readiness.ts— All criteria definitions,countStatus(),buildCriteria(),buildExtras(), pillar/level aggregation- Criteria scopes:
repo(always),app(per-application),area(only with--per-area) countStatus()excludes skipped checks from the denominator when computing pillar pass/total- Extras (bonus checks) are not scored — they don't affect levels or totals
CLI Rendering
packages/core/src/services/visualReport.ts— Generates the standalone HTML reportcalculateAiToolingData()— Aggregates AI criteria across repos (counts all including skipped in the hero display)- Total checks:
report.pillars.reduce((s, p) => s + p.total, 0) - Does not render bonus/extras section in HTML output
Webapp Backend
webapp/backend/src/services/scanner.js— Clones repo, callsrunReadinessReport()from@agentrc/corewebapp/backend/src/routes/scan.js—POST /api/scanendpoint- Returns the raw
ReadinessReportJSON (same shape as CLI) - Uses
@agentrc/coreas afile:../../packages/coredependency — always uses local source code
Webapp Frontend
webapp/frontend/src/report.js— Independent rendering implementation (NOT shared with CLI)buildHero()— Total fromreport.pillars.reduce((s, p) => s + p.total, 0)buildAiToolingHero()— Renders all AI criteria (including skipped) with pass/total countbuildPillarDetails()— Shows per-pillar expandable cards- Does render bonus checks section (unlike CLI)
- Has Service Information section (policy chain, engine signals) — CLI doesn't
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 164 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 3aaef68209d5
align-cli-webapp-reports is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/agentrc (1,109 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,698 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
deck-retro
Run a fully local agent-deck retrospective over the user's own transcripts, Recall index and logs. Use when a user wants to find recurring failures or take their own finding from investigation through synthetic reproduction, a user-filed issue, a test-first fix and contributor PR handoff. Also use for weekly usage…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.