automated-code-compliance-review

automated-code-compliance-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/aibast-agents-library. It costs 34 tokens per session (163 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated check of a residential building plan against building, electrical, plumbing, and zoning rules. It reports findings and flags corrections; it is not a legal or official compliance certificate.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect setbacks, lot coverage, height, egress windows, GFCI protection, and structural limits, then identify the two needed corrections.
Why use it?
It gives reviewers a structured list of possible issues before resubmission. Keeping the results as findings prevents an automated check from being mistaken for official approval.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to inspect setbacks, lot coverage, height, egress windows, GFCI protection, and structural limits, then identify the two needed corrections.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09
About the project

AIBAST Agents Library is a collection of industry-focused AI agent templates accompanied by a local server that connects agents to GitHub Copilot for language-model inference. It helps developers create and run tool-using agents and isolated project environments, with an optional cloud-backed path for persistent memory. The catalogue entries provide the repository's agents, skills, commands, hooks, and instructions.

microsoft/aibast-agents-library · 8 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/aibast-agents-library --skill aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/aibast-agents-library

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for automated-code-compliance-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for automated-code-compliance-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 163 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00163
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00065
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00033
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00016

Measured 21d ago against content hash 647ae3ef4f73, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

automated-code-compliance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

solutions/building-permit-processing/manual/skills/aibast_code-compliance-review_bp09/SKILL.md · 9 lines

What it actually says

Automated code compliance review

Report the 247 requirements checked, the six results (setbacks met 15 ft, lot coverage 28% of 35%, height 18 ft of 25 ft, egress window flag 5.7 sq ft minimum, GFCI flag 1 of 2, structural within limits), the two corrections (egress cut sheet; second GFCI per NEC 210.8), and the 1-2 day resubmission impact. These are review findings, not a compliance certification; do not certify code compliance.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 21d ago First seen · 9 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 647ae3ef4f73

Subscribe to this mod's changes

automated-code-compliance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/aibast-agents-library (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 163 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-09.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

fto-triage

Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…

anthropics/claude-for-legal · 81 tokens

legal-hold

Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.

anthropics/claude-for-legal · 68 tokens

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

terms-of-service

Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.

genspark-ai/genoffice · 32 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

ai-risk-management

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills · 180 tokens