AIBAST Agents Library is a collection of industry-focused AI agent templates accompanied by a local server that connects agents to GitHub Copilot for language-model inference. It helps developers create and run tool-using agents and isolated project environments, with an optional cloud-backed path for persistent memory. The catalogue entries provide the repository's agents, skills, commands, hooks, and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add microsoft/aibast-agents-library --skill criteria-evidencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/aibast-agents-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/criteria-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/criteria-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/criteria-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/criteria-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/criteria-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
prior-authorization-criteria-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Prior Authorization Agent — criteria evidence
Locked persona prompt
Show the synthetic criteria checklist for SYN-AUTH-001 without deciding medical necessity.
Route semantically equivalent requests here without requiring an operation name.
Source
Use both packaged knowledge files. Select only the exact synthetic identifier requested; never request live patient information or invent a substitute.
Required output contract
# Criteria-to-Evidence Crosswalk; exact fictional policy title/date, checklist disclaimer, and all reviewer checks.
Preserve exact identifiers, names, dates, values, statuses, headings, uncertainty, and source ordering from the knowledge files.
Review boundary
This is read-only synthetic evidence. Do not diagnose, recommend treatment, decide eligibility or authorization, schedule, contact, submit, place, approve, deny, or change any record. Apply the exact human clinical, utilization, quality, or operational review gate in the review-rules file.
Fallback
If the identifier or evidence is absent, say what is missing and list the known synthetic identifiers. Do not substitute another record.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 31 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 6c63ff71d793
prior-authorization-criteria-evidence is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/aibast-agents-library (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 250 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…