apm: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker/SKILL.md

autopilot-issue-delivery-worker is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/apm. It costs 114 tokens per session (1,794 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An implementation worker for one already-selected microsoft/apm GitHub issue. It can work within an accepted scope when permitted, rather than choosing issues or managing the queue.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to reproduce and implement an accepted issue, or to produce the required no-write plan when writing is disabled.
Why use it?
It separates authorized implementation from triage and ensures the worker handles only one issue with the required governance checks.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is microsoft/apm's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on apm itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything apm configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is node scripts/governance/eligibility.cjs --help.

About the project

APM is a package manager for AI-agent configuration, using a manifest to declare reusable instructions, skills, prompts, agents, hooks, plugins, and MCP components. Development teams use it to reproduce agent setups across projects and control their dependencies through policies and lockfiles, while the catalogue contains many of these agent components.

microsoft/apm · 4,133 stars · on GitHub · microsoft.github.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to microsoft/apm. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/apm/main/.agents/skills/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/apm

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for autopilot-issue-delivery-worker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for autopilot-issue-delivery-worker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/apm/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,794 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00114 $0.01794
Opus 5.5 $0.00046 $0.00718
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00359
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00179

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 75609428a685, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

autopilot-issue-delivery-worker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/autopilot-issue-delivery-worker/SKILL.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

autopilot-issue-delivery-worker

Per-issue implementation worker. The parent autopilot-issue-delivery-scheduler owns the queue and the fan-out pool. You own exactly one ISSUE_NUMBER.

Do not pick more issues. Do not fill other slots.

Activation card

activation_card: on. Before any issue read or GitHub write, emit this Enter card with every field filled. Missing field -> stop.

skill: autopilot-issue-delivery-worker
skill_path: <resolved directory of this SKILL.md>
mode: run
subject: microsoft/apm#<issue-number>
path: delivery
intent: implement one already-selected issue
origin: unattended | actor-session
write: on | off
repo: microsoft/apm
issue: <positive integer>
invocation: agentic-workflow | actor-session

Rules:

  • write defaults to on when the caller omitted it.
  • write: off returns the filled template only. Do not assign, comment, label, edit, or open a PR.
  • write: on may assign @me (actor-session only) and implement inside the accepted scope. Unattended never assigns and never implements.
  • origin fail-closed unknown -> unattended.
  • One issue. Do not nest a scheduler path.

After the run, emit this Exit receipt:

skill: autopilot-issue-delivery-worker
subject: microsoft/apm#<issue-number>
path: delivery
write: on | off
assigned: yes | no | skipped
pushed: yes | no
approved: n/a

Inputs

  • ISSUE_NUMBER -- required
  • SELECTOR -- all (default) or bugs
  • REPO_ROOT -- required
  • ORIGIN -- if the parent passed it, honor it; else resolve
  • TRUSTED_GOVERNANCE_ROOT -- trusted default-branch copy
  • APPROVAL_URL -- nominated scope-comment URL
  • HUMAN_SCOPE_RECEIPT -- current human confirmation, not a stored grant

ORIGIN and assignment

Resolve ORIGIN before any GitHub write:

  1. Caller ORIGIN / INVOCATION_MODE
  2. GH_AW_* or GITHUB_ACTIONS -> unattended
  3. gh api user --jq .login succeeds -> actor-session
  4. Else unattended (fail closed)

INTENT is implement.

When ORIGIN is actor-session, assignment is a hard gate. It is the public signal of which user is working this issue. GitHub allows multiple assignees, so a read-then-add is not a claim. Before reproduce, edits, or a PR:

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 75609428a685

Subscribe to this mod's changes

autopilot-issue-delivery-worker is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/apm (4,133 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,794 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-17.