check-cross-references

check-cross-references is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/cat-agent-skills. It costs 157 tokens per session (2,904 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A legal-document check that verifies internal references to clauses, schedules, annexes, exhibits, and other incorporated material. It reports missing, outdated, ambiguous, or unverifiable references with citations and possible mechanical corrections.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit cross-references in a supplied legal document and suggest fixes when the intended target is clear. It does not alter the document or decide questions of substantive legal meaning.
Why use it?
It helps catch broken links inside a contract before readers rely on the wrong clause or cannot find the material being referenced.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to audit cross-references in a supplied legal document and suggest fixes when the intended target is clear. It does not alter the document or decide questions of substantive legal meaning.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references
About the project

microsoft/cat-agent-skills is a static website that catalogs reusable instruction sets and related packages for AI agents. People use it to search, filter, rate, and download skills for Cowork, Copilot Studio, and Scout, along with Copilot plugins and Scout automations. The catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugins, and settings displayed by the site.

microsoft/cat-agent-skills · 101 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/cat-agent-skills --skill check-cross-references
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/cat-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for check-cross-references

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for check-cross-references

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/check-cross-references.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 157 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,904 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00157 $0.02904
Opus 5.5 $0.00063 $0.01162
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00031 $0.00581
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00290

Measured 2d ago against content hash 03148f49a74d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

check-cross-references scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

submissions/legal-for-cowork/skills/check-cross-references/SKILL.md · 219 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check cross-references

Review the complete legal document the user supplied for incorrect internal cross-references, and for references that cannot be verified because required referenced material — a separate agreement, schedule, annex, exhibit or other incorporated document — was not provided. Suggest a mechanical correction where the intended target is clear from the document itself. Identifying the target is not automatically a legal judgement: where the cited identifier is missing or wrong but the reference's subject and surrounding wording match exactly one indexed provision, replacing the identifier is a confident mechanical correction. Flag for review only where more than one target is plausible, no target is established by the document, or choosing one would resolve substantive legal meaning.

Never change the document. Every correction is reported as clearly labelled suggested wording the user reviews and applies or ignores. You propose; the user decides.

When NOT to Use

  • Terms used but not defined, defined twice, or used inconsistently — use check-defined-terms. That skill audits definition integrity; this one audits reference integrity, and each names the other.
  • Blanks, [●] placeholders, unresolved tracked changes or signature blocks checked for completeness before signing — use check-execution-readiness.
  • What a referenced clause actually means, or how two provisions interact — use legal-reasoning; plain English for a non-legal audience — use explain-legal-concepts.
  • What changed between marked-up versions — use summarize-redlines; how a family of related contracts fits together — use analyze-related-contracts.
  • Producing the findings as a file — dispatch docx, xlsx or pdf.
  • Editing, redlining or commenting on a document; renumbering provisions; rewriting legal wording; a playbook or compliance review; improving drafting style that is not actually incorrect; or deciding what an ambiguous reference should say — all out of scope; see Guardrails.

Read the full file on GitHub · 219 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 219 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A 03148f49a74d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

check-cross-references is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/cat-agent-skills (101 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 2,904 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.

Related

check-cross-references compared with skills from other repositories

check-cross-references next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
check-cross-referencesmicrosoft/cat-agent-skillsSkill101yesterdayMITA157Claude Code, Codex
fto-triageanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A81Claude Code
legal-holdanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A68Claude Code
specification-writingwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepSkill19ktodayMITA49Claude Code
regulatory-research-fallbackHKUDS/OpenSpaceSkill7.9k2d agoMITA20Claude Code, Codex
terms-of-servicegenspark-ai/genofficeSkill12ktodayApache-2.0A32Claude Code, Codex
x-scorecardx-cmd/x-cmdSkill4.7k8d agoApache-2.0A57Claude Code, Codex