policy-gap-analysis

policy-gap-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/cat-agent-skills. It costs 173 tokens per session (2,213 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A clause-by-clause comparison between a company policy and a regulation. It quotes both sources, shows how the policy addresses each requirement, and suggests edits without declaring the company compliant or non-compliant.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to map a procedure to a specific rule, build a coverage table, collect source excerpts, and prepare owner-reviewed policy changes.
Why use it?
It makes gaps and possible coverage visible without treating missing documents or unsupported assumptions as evidence. A qualified owner can then decide what the findings mean.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to map a procedure to a specific rule, build a coverage table, collect source excerpts, and prepare owner-reviewed policy changes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis
About the project

microsoft/cat-agent-skills is a static website that catalogs reusable instruction sets and related packages for AI agents. People use it to search, filter, rate, and download skills for Cowork, Copilot Studio, and Scout, along with Copilot plugins and Scout automations. The catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugins, and settings displayed by the site.

microsoft/cat-agent-skills · 101 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/cat-agent-skills --skill policy-gap-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/cat-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for policy-gap-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for policy-gap-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/policy-gap-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 173 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,213 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00173 $0.02213
Opus 5.5 $0.00069 $0.00885
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00035 $0.00443
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00221

Measured 2d ago against content hash 862dc08e8d45, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

policy-gap-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/lint_deliverable.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

submissions/fsi-risk-and-compliance/policy-gap-analysis/SKILL.md · 162 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scope

Do: compare specific regulation sections to a firm policy clause by clause, quote both sides, assign coverage states, suggest owner-reviewed edits Do not: conclude compliant, non-compliant, or in violation, score unretrieved requirements, treat drafts or unretrieved referenced documents as coverage, alter source systems, send, or file anything

When NOT to Use

  • Triaging a newly published rule across the firm — use reg-change-triage instead.
  • An examiner request list or PDL response tracker — use exam-request-response instead.
  • Formatting, charting, or restyling an existing workbook — use xlsx instead.

Policy-to-Regulation Gap Analysis

Clause-by-clause: what the regulation requires, what the policy says, and whether the second addresses the first.

This skill never concludes compliance. It reports coverage states with both sides quoted. Whether the firm complies is a determination by a qualified owner — house-rules.md § 2.


Read first

Read these in full before step 1. They are binding; this body only summarises them.

  • references/workflow.md — the full text of every step below, with the guardrails, source resolution, and footer detail.
  • references/house-rules.md — destination gate, determination gate, authority tiers, markers, footers, and § 12 data minimisation (every artifact, search, and chat reply, declines included).
  • references/reg-source-access.md — routing, the codification gap, precision filtering.
  • references/document-extraction.md — policy version and approval discipline.
  • references/gap-outline.md — default table and memo structure: the output format.
  • references/self-check.md — the final self-check (step 7).

Workflow

1. Establish both sides before comparing

Detail: workflow.md § 1.

  • Regulation: agency · citation · type · tier · sections in scope. Retrieve per reg-source-access.md and run the codification check; an effective later final rule governs (PENDING CODIFICATION), a future one is a forthcoming change in the Source cell. House-rules markers only, plus PROPOSED DRAFTING.
  • Policy: name · version · approval status · approval date · owner · scope. A draft is DRAFT — not approved, never the control of record. When the policy given is a draft or superseded, find and open the approved version and state Control of record: <doc> v<x>, approved <date> (<location>) in § 2 and the chat reply: a fact, never a D-bullet. Version or approval unknown → GAP — policy version not established, and no row is scored as covered.
  • Scope is load-bearing. Quote the policy's scope clause. Which entities, accounts, or products the rule covers is proposed applicability: NOT DETERMINED, compliance owner decides, with the retrieved defining provision cited. If that provision was not retrieved, the reasoning reads exactly none - defining provision not retrieved. No hedge words.

Read the full file on GitHub · 162 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 162 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A 862dc08e8d45

Subscribe to this mod's changes

policy-gap-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/cat-agent-skills (101 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 2,213 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.

Related

policy-gap-analysis compared with skills from other repositories

policy-gap-analysis next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
policy-gap-analysismicrosoft/cat-agent-skillsSkill101yesterdayMITA173Claude Code, Codex
fto-triageanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A81Claude Code
legal-holdanthropics/claude-for-legalSkill9.9kyesterdayApache-2.0A68Claude Code
specification-writingwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepSkill19ktodayMITA49Claude Code
regulatory-research-fallbackHKUDS/OpenSpaceSkill7.9k2d agoMITA20Claude Code, Codex
terms-of-servicegenspark-ai/genofficeSkill12ktodayApache-2.0A32Claude Code, Codex
x-scorecardx-cmd/x-cmdSkill4.7k8d agoApache-2.0A57Claude Code, Codex