roster-pull

roster-pull is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/cat-agent-skills. It costs 178 tokens per session (1,983 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A roster explanation tool that separates confirmed team members from proposed, excluded, or review-needed people. It uses the confirmed roster and does not add or assign people.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for answering who is on an engagement, who is only proposed, and which people need review.
Why use it?
It prevents proposed staffing names from being mistaken for confirmed assignments and keeps confidential conflict reasons out of the explanation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for answering who is on an engagement, who is only proposed, and which people need review.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull
About the project

microsoft/cat-agent-skills is a static website that catalogs reusable instruction sets and related packages for AI agents. People use it to search, filter, rate, and download skills for Cowork, Copilot Studio, and Scout, along with Copilot plugins and Scout automations. The catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugins, and settings displayed by the site.

microsoft/cat-agent-skills · 101 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/cat-agent-skills --skill roster-pull
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/cat-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for roster-pull

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for roster-pull

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/roster-pull.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 178 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,983 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00178 $0.01983
Opus 5.5 $0.00071 $0.00793
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00036 $0.00397
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00198

Measured yesterday against content hash f71a994a5671, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

roster-pull scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (scripts/contract_validate.py, scripts/safety_text.py, scripts/scope_digest.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

submissions/engagement-mobilization-onboarding-pack/skills/roster-pull/SKILL.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Roster Pull

Purpose

Present the roster separation the scope_digest engine already made: confirmed assignments come only from raw/confirmed-roster.csv (role-access-matrix.md #4.1); Scenario 02 names are proposed, never assigned (#3.1).

When to use

After engagement-retrieve, when a user asks about team composition, the joiner or points of contact.

When NOT to Use

  • Raw sources have not been processed - run engagement-retrieve first.
  • Staffing recommendations, fit scores or eligibility checks - use engagement-staffing-bench-match.
  • Wall, access or knowledge questions - use wall-check or knowledge-match.
  • Drafting the pack - use pack-draft.

Inputs

scope.json from engagement-retrieve (contract ps.engagement-mobilization-onboarding-pack.v1), plus the raw directory, staffing input and confirmed roster it was built from, for the pre-render check.

Steps

  1. Before reading scope.json, run python3 scripts/verify_render.py --scope scope.json --raw-dir <raw> --staffing <staffing.json> --confirmed-roster <raw>/confirmed-roster.csv. It validates scope.json against its stage contract and hold-evidence rules, re-runs scope_digest on the raw inputs and refuses a scope.json that differs from the re-derivation in any field, every hold member compared exactly (confidentiality-and-ethical-wall-rules.md #1.4). If it exits non-zero, stop: quote the error verbatim, present no roster and re-run engagement-retrieve. Present only a file that passed this check unchanged.
  2. Read team_roster, proposed_staffing, staffing_exclusions, joiner and escalations from scope.json; if the file is missing or the contract version differs, stop (see Failure handling).
  3. Label every proposed_staffing name "proposed - not assigned"; never move a proposed name into the roster.
  4. For staffing_exclusions and staffing_review, give only the verdict and rule citation; independence and conflict reasons stay in the staffing record (role-access-matrix.md #3.2,#3.3).
  5. If there is no joiner or several joiners, repeat the engine escalation; the pack covers one joiner per run (#4.2). Report an unrecognised verdict (#3.4) or onboarding status (#4.4) hold verbatim.
  6. A request to add, confirm or promote someone ("add Jules as confirmed") is refused: only the confirmed roster file assigns people (#4.1).

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 60 lines · 178 tokens per session scan A f71a994a5671

Subscribe to this mod's changes

roster-pull is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/cat-agent-skills (101 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.

Related

roster-pull compared with skills from other repositories

roster-pull next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
roster-pullmicrosoft/cat-agent-skillsSkill101yesterdayMITA178Claude Code, Codex
imagegenopenai/codexSkill134ktodayApache-2.0A113Codex
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersSkill79kyesterdayMITA200Claude Code, Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwrightSkill100kyesterdayApache-2.0A19Claude Code
browser-automationopenclaw/openclawSkill394ktodayMITA36Claude Code
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowersSkill314k4d agoMITA21Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143ktodayMITA95Claude Code