scoop-check

A research-novelty checker that compares a problem and claimed contribution with existing published work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check whether a proposed method, theorem, dataset, framing, or insight overlaps with prior research.
Why use it?
It helps reveal when similar work already exists and clarify what, if anything, is genuinely different.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/researchstudio/scoop_check
Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/ResearchStudio --skill scoop_check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/ResearchStudio

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 106 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,619 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00106 $0.04619
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.02309
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00924
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00462

Measured 3d ago against content hash a6bc30399f18, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scoop-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/fetch_paper.sh), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

ResearchStudio-Idea/skills/scoop_check/SKILL.md · 200 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scoop Check

Systematically verify whether a proposed research novelty overlaps with existing literature. The goal is to either (a) surface prior work that already covers the claim, or (b) produce a crisp, defensible "delta" statement that distinguishes the proposed contribution.

Inputs

This skill requires exactly two inputs from the user:

  1. Research problem — the specific issue, challenge, or gap in knowledge being addressed.
  2. Novelty — the specific claimed contribution (new method, theorem, dataset, framing, or insight) that distinguishes this work from prior art.

If either input is missing, vague, or conflated (e.g., the "novelty" merely restates the problem), infer the most reasonable interpretation and proceed immediately. Do not use AskUserQuestion or pause for confirmation at any point — always proceed directly through every step.

Procedure

Execute the steps below in order. At the start of the procedure, use TaskCreate to register all seven steps as tasks up front, then mark each as in_progress when you begin it and completed when you finish. The procedure is long enough that progress tracking is always worth the small overhead — without it, it's easy to skip a step (especially the per-step logging in the Important Notes) or lose track of which candidates still need a deep dive.

Step 1 — Decompose the Novelty

Break the claimed Novelty into four atomic axes, presented as a labeled list:

  • Problem framing — Task definition, inputs, outputs, and evaluation regime.
  • Core mechanism — The technical contribution — architecture, algorithm, proof technique, or data construction.
  • Key insight — What makes it work; what prior state-of-the-art lacked.
  • Application domain — Where it applies and how broadly.

Step 2 — Search and Deduplicate

Read the Research problem and craft three complementary search queries:

  • Query 1 — Original-Problem: restate the original research problem. Example: score-based generative model fast inference
  • Query 2 — Broad-Domain: the high-level area, ~3–5 words. Example: diffusion model sampling efficiency
  • Query 3 — Method-Signature: the specific technical move, ~5–8 words. Example: consistency model knowledge distillation

Read the full file on GitHub · 200 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 200 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A a6bc30399f18

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scoop-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/ResearchStudio (2,614 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 4,619 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ppt-master

AI-driven presentation workflow for generating editable PPTX decks and slides, reconstructing page visuals, creating reusable Brand/Style/Layout/Deck workspaces, filling native PPTX templates, and enhancing finished PPTX files. Use when the user asks to create, generate, reconstruct, regenerate, beautify, redesign…

hugohe3/ppt-master · 108 tokens

slidev

Create and present web-based slidedecks for developers using Slidev with Markdown, Vue components, code highlighting, animations, and interactive features. Use when building technical presentations, conference talks, code walkthroughs, teaching materials, or developer decks.

slidevjs/slidev · 51 tokens

guizang-ppt-skill

生成横向翻页网页 PPT(单 HTML 文件),含 WebGL 背景、演讲者视图、观众屏同步、讲稿备注、章节幕封、数据大字报、图片网格等模板。提供两种风格:① "电子杂志 × 电子墨水"(衬线 + 流体背景 + 暖色) ② "瑞士国际主义"(无衬线 + 网格点阵 + IKB/柠檬黄/柠檬绿/安全橙高亮)。当用户需要制作分享 / 演讲 / 发布会风格的网页 PPT,或提到"杂志风 PPT"、"瑞士风 PPT"、"Swiss Style"、"horizontal swipe deck"时使用。.

op7418/guizang-ppt-skill · 176 tokens

Presentation Skills Index

Skills for creating presentations, slides, and visual documentation.

aristoteleo/PantheonOS · 15 tokens

fin-arch-diagram

生成研究/项目架构图、流程图、层次图(swimlane / processflow / hierarchytree)。适合 PPT 汇报、技术文档、综述插图。输出风格接近 draw.io,可选 graphviz(高质量)/ matplotlib(零依赖)双后端。.

csmar432/finai-research · 72 tokens

impress-presentations

Use when creating, opening, or editing LibreOffice Impress ODP presentations, or PPTX decks only when PowerPoint compatibility is explicitly required.

agent0ai/agent-zero · 33 tokens