analyze-evals

analyze-evals is a skill for Claude Code from microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio. It costs 52 tokens per session (757 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A tool for reading CSV evaluation results exported from Microsoft Copilot Studio, a service for building AI agents. It finds failed tests and suggests fixes in YAML, a text format for configuration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review an agent's test questions, compare expected and actual answers, examine failure explanations, and draft YAML changes for problems it finds.
Why use it?
It turns a results file into a focused list of failures, so you do not have to inspect every test response manually.

Skill for Claude Code ✓ vendor

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: agent in frontmatter.

Part of the copilot-studio plugin — 31 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it to review an agent's test questions, compare expected and actual answers, examine failure explanations, and draft YAML changes for problems it finds.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals
About the project

Skills for Copilot Studio is a plugin for authoring, testing, and troubleshooting standard Microsoft Copilot Studio agents as YAML files from a terminal or editor. It is intended for users of Claude Code, GitHub Copilot CLI, and VS Code who work with Copilot Studio agents. The catalogue add-ons are the plugin's skills, agents, hook, and plugin definition.

microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio · 433 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio --skill analyze-evals
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install copilot-studio, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 31 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-evals

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyze-evals

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio/analyze-evals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 757 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.00757
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00378
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00076

Measured 9d ago against content hash 7768f4f3dc20, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-evals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/analyze-evals/SKILL.md · 63 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyze Copilot Studio Evaluation Results

Analyze evaluation results exported from the Copilot Studio UI as CSV.

Phase 1: Get Results

  1. Ask the user for the CSV file path if not already provided. The file is typically exported from Copilot Studio's Evaluate tab and named Evaluate <agent name> <date>.csv in their Downloads folder.

  2. Read the CSV file. The in-product evaluation CSV has these columns:

    Column Meaning
    question The test utterance
    expectedResponse Expected response (may be empty)
    actualResponse What the agent responded
    testMethodType_1 Eval method (e.g., GeneralQuality)
    result_1 Pass or Fail
    passingScore_1 Score threshold (may be empty)
    explanation_1 Why it passed/failed (e.g., "Seems relevant; Seems incomplete; Knowledge sources not cited")

    The _1 suffix indicates the first eval method. There may be additional methods (_2, _3, etc.) with the same column pattern.

Phase 2: Analyze Results

  1. Focus on failed evaluations (result_1 = Fail, or any result_N = Fail).

  2. For each failure, use the explanation column to understand the issue:

    • "Question not answered" — The agent couldn't handle the question. Check if there's a matching topic or knowledge source.
    • "Knowledge sources not cited" — The agent responded but didn't cite sources. Check knowledge source configuration and SearchAndSummarizeContent nodes.
    • "Seems incomplete" — The response was partial. Check topic flow for early exits, missing branches, or incomplete SendActivity messages.
    • Error messages in actualResponse (e.g., GenAIToolPlannerRateLimitReached) — These are runtime errors, not authoring issues. Flag them to the user as transient failures to retry.

Phase 3: Propose Fixes

  1. For each failure, identify the relevant YAML file(s):
    • Auto-discover the agent: Glob: **/agent.mcs.yml
    • Find the relevant topic by matching the test utterance against trigger phrases and model descriptions
    • Read the topic file to understand the current flow

Read the full file on GitHub · 63 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 63 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7768f4f3dc20

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-evals is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio (433 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 757 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…

microsoft/vscode · 72 tokens