cost-analysis

cost-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/sre-agent. It costs 57 tokens per session (883 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Instructions for a read-only review of Azure cloud spending for the Zava Learning resource group. The review compares spending periods, identifies costly or idle resources, and suggests savings without changing anything.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running weekly or scheduled cost audits, comparing current and previous spending, finding likely waste, and writing recommended optimisations.
Why use it?
They provide a defined fallback when billing data or permissions are unavailable and keep the audit from making infrastructure changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Running weekly or scheduled cost audits, comparing current and previous spending, finding likely waste, and writing recommended optimisations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis
About the project

microsoft/sre-agent is the community repository for Azure SRE Agent, an AI assistant for diagnosing and resolving production problems and reducing routine operations work. It is for teams working on service reliability and includes documentation, discussions, videos, and hands-on labs for using the product. The catalogue skills relate to the agent's official plugins and resources.

microsoft/sre-agent · 179 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/sre-agent --skill cost-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/sre-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cost-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cost-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/sre-agent/cost-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 883 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.00883
Opus 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00353
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00177
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00088

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4fbbef252474, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cost-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

labs/zava-learning/sre-config/agent-config/skills/cost-analysis/SKILL.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Zava Learning — Cloud Cost Analysis

Resource Group: @@RG@@. Read-only audit — never resize, deallocate, or delete a resource. This is a weekly spend posture review. Recommend optimisations for a human to apply; change nothing.

1. Pull actual spend (preferred path)

Use Cost Management for real billed amounts, scoped to the RG:

  • This week vs. last week by resource: az costmanagement query --type ActualCost --timeframe Custom --time-period from=<start> to=<end> --scope "/subscriptions/<sub>/resourceGroups/@@RG@@" --dataset-grouping name=ResourceId type=Dimension --dataset-aggregation totalCost.name=Cost totalCost.function=Sum (run it for the current 7-day window and the prior 7-day window, then diff per ResourceId).
  • Or month-to-date by service: same query grouped by ServiceName. If az costmanagement is missing or returns an auth error (the agent identity lacks Cost Management Reader), FALL BACK to az consumption usage list --start-date <d> --end-date <d> filtered to the RG. Record which data source you used so the report is honest about provenance.

2. If billing data is unavailable, estimate from inventory

As a last resort (no Cost Management and no consumption access), build an estimate:

  • Inventory the RG: az resource list -g @@RG@@ --query "[].{name:name,type:type,sku:sku}".
  • Note the cost-bearing resources (PostgreSQL Flexible Server SKU, the reporting VM SKU + managed disks, Container Apps environments + per-app replicas/scale, Application Gateway tier + capacity units, Log Analytics ingestion, Key Vault, ACR SKU, public IPs).
  • Use microsoft-learn_microsoft_docs_search / known Azure retail pricing to produce a rough, clearly-labelled estimate, not a billed figure. State the assumption explicitly.

3. Find waste and right-sizing opportunities (read-only signals)

  • Idle/oversized: VMs that are deallocated yet still incurring disk cost; disks not attached to any VM (az disk list -g @@RG@@ --query "[?managedBy==null]"); over-provisioned VM/DB SKUs vs. observed CPU/memory; Container Apps with high min-replicas but low traffic.
  • Orphaned: unattached public IPs, empty App Gateway backend pools, unused NICs, old ACR images.
  • Trend: any ResourceId whose week-over-week cost rose sharply — flag it with the Δ%.

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 4fbbef252474

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cost-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/sre-agent (179 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 883 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sector-rotation

An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 39 tokens

twitter-reader

Read Twitter/X for financial research through opencli: the user's home timeline, tweet search, trending topics, bookmarks, a user's recent tweets, threads, articles, profiles, followers and following, and notifications. Use this skill whenever the user wants to know what people are saying on Twitter/X or fintwit about…

himself65/finance-skills · 110 tokens

strategy-pivot-designer

Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.

tradermonty/claude-trading-skills · 28 tokens

energy-procurement

Codified expertise for electricity and gas procurement, tariff optimization, demand charge management, renewable PPA evaluation, and multi-facility energy cost management. Informed by energy procurement managers with 15+ years experience at large commercial and industrial consumers. Includes market structure analysis…

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins · 93 tokens

airdrop-hunting-guide

Guide to finding and qualifying for crypto airdrops — eligibility criteria, farming strategies, on-chain activity requirements, Sybil detection avoidance, and tracking tools. Use when helping users understand airdrops, check eligibility, or plan participation strategies.

nirholas/three.ws · 54 tokens

china-portfolio-monitoring

A monitoring framework for tracking the financial results, operating measures, strategic milestones, and risks of companies held by China-focused private-equity funds. It uses measures such as revenue growth, margins, debt, cash flow, and return on equity.

jwangkun/claude-for-financial-services-cn · 86 tokens