pr-delivery

A workflow for delivering a permanent incident fix as a GitHub pull request, a proposed code change that can be reviewed before merging. It covers application code and Infrastructure as Code (IaC), which defines cloud resources in files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after temporary mitigation to locate the repository, prepare a branch and commit, redact sensitive information, and open a pull request for a fix in application code or cloud configuration.
Why use it?
It gives root-caused fixes a reviewable version-control record and helps keep secrets and sensitive incident details out of the change.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/sre-agent/pr-delivery
Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/sre-agent --skill pr-delivery
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/sre-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 83 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 829 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00083 $0.00829
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.00415
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00166
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00083

Measured 3d ago against content hash c97280dbba6a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-delivery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

labs/zava-learning/sre-config/agent-config/skills/pr-delivery/SKILL.md · 61 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Zava Learning — Pull Request Delivery (IaC + Code)

Single owner of GitHub pull-request creation for durable fixes. Repo: @@REPO@@ (hosts the app src/ and the infrastructure infra/). This skill applies once an incident is root-caused and the live mitigation is in place; the pull request it produces is later referenced by the ServiceNow Change Request (servicenow-change-management).

There is no native GitHub pull-request tool — author the branch, commit, and open the PR with ExecutePythonCode (GitHub REST API / gh) using FindConnectedGitHubRepo and GetIaCForGitHub to locate the repo and IaC. Never commit secrets. Before opening the PR, retrieve SearchMemory("zava-redaction") and run its redact() over the PR title, body, and commit message (and never stage a credential or .env/*.pem/git-credentials file into the diff).

When to use

  • An incident is root-caused to a durable defect and the live mitigation is already applied.
  • The fix belongs in version control: IaC (infra/, e.g. an NSG rule in infra/modules/network.bicep, or a value in infra/main.parameters.json) or application code (src/, e.g. a synchronous crypto regression in src/assessment-api/server.js).

Decide the change class

  • Infrastructure (IaC): the fix is a guardrail or config in Bicep / parameters. Make BOTH live Azure and the committed IaC reflect the corrected state so the next deploy keeps the fix.
  • Application code: the fix is in src/. The live mitigation was a revision rollback/restart; the PR carries the actual code correction.

Steps

  1. Resolve the repo and IaC type (FindConnectedGitHubRepo, GetIaCForGitHub).
  2. Branch from default: fix/<symptom-slug> (e.g. fix/quiz-launch-nsg-priority).
  3. Apply the minimal, surgical change. Match existing style. Touch only what the root cause requires.
  4. Commit with a conventional message: fix(<area>): <symptom> — <root cause> and a body that summarizes the RCA and links the PagerDuty incident.
  5. Open the PR against @@REPO@@. PR body must include: symptom, root cause, the change, verification evidence (link the Before/After), and the PagerDuty incident number.
  6. Capture the PR URL — the ServiceNow Change Request (servicenow-change-management) references it. Post the PR link back in the PagerDuty incident notes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 61 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 61 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c97280dbba6a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-delivery is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/sre-agent (149 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 829 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens