Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophynpx skills add microsoft/vscode --skill design-philosophygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/vscodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00086 | $0.06375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.03188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00637 |
Grade A, and why
design-philosophy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 481 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
VS Code Design Philosophy
This skill is the canonical VS Code design philosophy — the single source of truth for how we reason about UI, for both developers and agents.
As more and more of the UI is implemented via agents and tooling, the pixels increasingly take care of themselves, and the scarce, human part becomes the design judgment behind them.
This is about shifting left - talking about UI in design terms, not pixels, and having that conversation early. When something looks off, "this is 8px, should be 6px" fixes one number; "this surface is rounded at the wrong elevation tier" names the rule, so the fix lands everywhere and we catch it on a mockup or screenshot rather than in code review. The aim is to agree on what the UI should be and why, in language a designer and an engineer can share - the implementation (which token, which file) tends to follow once the design is settled.
How to read this: three layers
The hardest part of any design language is getting from "this feels off" to a clear, shared fix everyone agrees on. This bridges that in three steps, each explaining the one below it:
| Layer | What it is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Values | what we want people to feel, and why it's at stake | Focused |
| Principles | evaluative rules you can hold a design up against, phrased as a question | "One thing leads; the rest supports" - where does the eye go first? |
| Moves | the concrete mechanics, each with a rule for which one and why | demote the secondary panel to a recessed background token / a quieter type role |
Read top-down when you're learning the system, and bottom-up when you're fixing a bug: name the feeling, find the principle it breaks, then reach for the move that restores it.
Worked example - a busy panel
- See: a panel feels busy and keeps pulling your eye off the editor.
- Feeling: not Calm, not Focused.
- Principle: breaks Quiet at rest (it carries a permanent fill it shouldn't) and One thing leads (secondary chrome competing with the editor).
- Move: drop the panel to a recessed/transparent background token, reveal its border only on hover, and demote its labels to a quieter type role.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 481 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 3ba0cac231a7
design-philosophy is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/vscode (190,384 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 6,375 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
End-to-end PR reviewer for dotnet/maui. Orchestrates 3 phases — Pre-Flight, Try-Fix, Report. Gate runs separately before this skill. Use when asked to 'review PR #XXXXX', 'work on PR #XXXXX', or 'fix issue #XXXXX'.
run-integration-tests
Build, pack, and run .NET MAUI integration tests locally. Validates templates, samples, and end-to-end scenarios using the local workload.
mgmt-review-comment-resolution
Resolve review comments on Azure management-plane .NET SDK PRs. Handles renaming types/properties, changing property types, and other API surface adjustments by updating TypeSpec client.tsp and regenerating.
mpg-migration
Handles Azure SDK for .NET management-plane migrations from AutoRest/Swagger to TypeSpec; use for MPG, mgmt migration, or Azure.ResourceManager. migration requests.
roll-dice
Roll dice using a random number generator. Use when asked to roll a die (d6, d20, etc.), roll dice, or generate a random dice roll.
refresh-arm-sdk-release
WORKFLOW SKILL — Prepares Azure.ResourceManager SDK refresh pull requests in azure-sdk-for-net. WHEN: "prepare sdk refresh", "refresh Azure.ResourceManager package", "update ARM SDK from autorest tag", "refresh changelog dependencies". INVOKES: git and GitHub pull request tools for branch, commit, push, and PR…