vscode: Skill for Claude Code

.github/skills/design-philosophy/SKILL.md

design-philosophy is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/vscode. It costs 86 tokens per session (6,609 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A shared way to reason about VS Code’s visual design using values, principles, and reusable design decisions instead of isolated pixel measurements.

In plain words
What is it for?
It supports designing, building, reviewing, and discussing UI choices such as spacing, corners, typography, icons, color, elevation, and motion.
Why use it?
It helps turn vague feedback such as “this feels wrong” into design rules that can be applied consistently.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

This is microsoft/vscode's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on vscode itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything vscode configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is **⚠️ Known conflict - reconcile later.** This sentence-case guidance is the intended modern-UI direction, but it **contradicts** the repo-wide coding guideline .

About the project

Visual Studio Code is a code editor that supports editing, navigating, understanding, debugging, and extending software projects. Developers use it for the edit-build-debug cycle, and the catalogue add-ons provide skills, instructions, and agents for working within the editor.

microsoft/vscode · 194,219 stars · on GitHub · code.visualstudio.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to microsoft/vscode. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/vscode/main/.github/skills/design-philosophy/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/vscode

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-philosophy

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-philosophy

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/vscode/design-philosophy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 86 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,609 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Snyk pass 6 Sept 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00086 $0.06609
Opus 5.5 $0.00034 $0.02644
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.01322
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00661

Measured yesterday against content hash 87b7b112e718, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-philosophy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/design-philosophy/SKILL.md · 343 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 343 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

VS Code Design Philosophy

This skill is the canonical VS Code design philosophy — the single source of truth for how we reason about UI, for both developers and agents.

As more and more of the UI is implemented via agents and tooling, the pixels increasingly take care of themselves, and the scarce, human part becomes the design judgment behind them.

This is about shifting left - talking about UI in design terms, not pixels, and having that conversation early. When something looks off, "this is 8px, should be 6px" fixes one number; "this surface is rounded at the wrong elevation tier" names the rule, so the fix lands everywhere and we catch it on a mockup or screenshot rather than in code review. The aim is to agree on what the UI should be and why, in language a designer and an engineer can share - the implementation (which token, which file) tends to follow once the design is settled.


How to read this: three layers

The hardest part of any design language is getting from "this feels off" to a clear, shared fix everyone agrees on. This bridges that in three steps, each explaining the one below it:

Layer What it is Example
Values what we want people to feel, and why it's at stake Focused
Principles evaluative rules you can hold a design up against, phrased as a question "One thing leads; the rest supports" - where does the eye go first?
Moves the concrete mechanics, each with a rule for which one and why demote the secondary panel to a recessed background token / a quieter type role

Read top-down when you're learning the system, and bottom-up when you're fixing a bug: name the feeling, find the principle it breaks, then reach for the move that restores it.

Worked example - a busy panel

  • See: a panel feels busy and keeps pulling your eye off the editor.
  • Feeling: not Calm, not Focused.
  • Principle: breaks Quiet at rest (it carries a permanent fill it shouldn't) and One thing leads (secondary chrome competing with the editor).
  • Move: drop the panel to a recessed/transparent background token, reveal its border only on hover, and demote its labels to a quieter type role.

Read the full file on GitHub · 343 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · +18 lines 87b7b112e718
  2. 10d ago Changed · -6 lines e891dec5161a
  3. 1mo ago Changed · -150 lines 9a79cd71e4b7
  4. 1mo ago First seen · 481 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 3ba0cac231a7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-philosophy is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/vscode (194,219 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 6,609 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories