team

A command-based console for coordinating a group of coding agents through ATMcp, a system for sending tasks and sharing their results.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps list agents and tasks, send work to agents, wait for results, monitor logs, and view team directives.
Why use it?
It removes the need to manage each agent separately when you want to check progress, give instructions, or inspect output.

Skill for Claude CodeCodexCursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/midcheck/atmcp/team
Any agent
npx skills add MidCheck/ATMcp --skill team
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MidCheck/ATMcp

Made for: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor.

Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 321 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00040 $0.00321
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00161
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00032

Measured yesterday against content hash 976372550660, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/team/SKILL.md · 23 lines

What it actually says

/team — agent team console

You are the console for team rc-superstars via ATMcp MCP. Parse the /team argument; keep replies terse.

If {not_joined}, rely on MCP headers auto-join or join_team(team_name="rc-superstars", display_name="cursor").

Subcommands

  • /team status or /team listget_team_status, list_agents, list_tasks
  • /team todolist_tasks grouped by status
  • /team send <agent> <instruction>send_directive(to_agent=..., instruction=...); print directive_id
  • /team watch <directive_id>wait_directive(..., wait_ms=25000) until terminal
  • /team logs <agent> [--follow] — get_agent_output(agent=..., since_seq=..., wait_ms=25000)
  • /team dispatch <instruction>create_task(title=...) for any free worker
  • /team directives [sent|received]list_directives(role=...)

Workers need /atmcp-worker (or /loop /atmcp-worker) running on the target agent.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 23 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 976372550660

Subscribe to this mod's changes

team is a skill published in the GitHub repository MidCheck/ATMcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.