Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MigoXLab/webqa-agent --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MigoXLab/webqa-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/migoxlab/webqa-agent/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/migoxlab/webqa-agent/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/migoxlab/webqa-agent/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/migoxlab/webqa-agent/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/migoxlab/webqa-agent/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00922 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Skill
Structure your approach before acting. Decompose broad objectives into sequenced steps with completion criteria at key milestones.
When to Use
- The task describes a multi-step workflow (login, search, checkout, etc.)
- The objective is broad ("test fundamental functionalities")
- You are unfamiliar with the page structure
- The task involves state that carries across steps (form data, cart items)
Skip this skill for single-action tasks ("click the login button").
Planning Phases
Phase 1: Understand the Objective
- What is the end goal? What does success look like?
- Which pages/features are involved? Ignore unrelated ones.
- What data flows through the workflow? (e.g., search query -> results -> detail page)
Phase 2: Sequence the Steps
Order steps as a continuous workflow, each following from the previous outcome.
- Aim for 4-8 steps for substantial tasks, fewer for simple ones. Each step is one reasoning unit — typically 1-3 tool calls that achieve a single sub-goal.
- Use semantic intent, not element selectors:
- Good:
"Click the 'Submit' button below the form" - Bad:
"Click element #btn_47"or"Click at coordinates (400, 300)"
- Good:
- For each step, state what and why:
- Good:
"Enter a search query to test the search flow" - Bad:
"Type 'hello world' in the search box"
- Good:
- Mark dependencies between steps: if step 4 depends on data from
step 2's outcome, say so explicitly.
- Example:
"Step 4 uses the product name found in step 2's results"
- Example:
Phase 3: Place Completion Checkpoints
Insert a checkpoint every 3-5 steps at key milestones.
For each checkpoint, define what to verify (the completion condition), not how to verify it:
- Good:
"Verify: search results page loaded with matching items" - Bad:
"take_snapshot and check for a results container"
The completion condition answers: what state proves this milestone was reached? The execution cycle (system prompt Step 4) handles the how.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 6a4d2fb5ab1b
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository MigoXLab/webqa-agent (234 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 922 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
case-design
A structured test-case design workflow that turns requirements, prototypes, business context, or API documents into test cases. It can also convert Markdown test cases to Excel.
requirement-review
A controlled workflow for analysing and reviewing requirement documents. It uses a Python state machine to move through review phases and can resume an unfinished review.
nano-banana-pro-openrouter
Deterministic OpenRouter image generation adapter for Nano Banana Pro / Gemini image models. Use as skillexec when a meta-skill needs local image files and structured IMAGEREADY records without spawning an LLM agent.
skill-creator-linter
Internal tool (not user-invocable). Called by meta-skill-creator as a DAG step (kind: agent) to lint a candidate meta-skill SKILL.md against G1 (parse + reference check + xmlescape grep + structural lint) and G2 (scheduler dry-run with stub executors). Deterministic, sub-second, no LLM. Returns JSON diagnostics.
clinicaltrials-database
Query ClinicalTrials.gov via API v2. Search trials by condition, drug, location, status, or phase. Retrieve trial details by NCT ID, export data, for clinical research and patient matching.
openalex-database
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly…