Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mikedev115/Aetox --skill aetox-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mikedev115/AetoxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikedev115/aetox/aetox-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikedev115/aetox/aetox-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikedev115/aetox/aetox-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikedev115/aetox/aetox-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikedev115/aetox/aetox-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00913 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
aetox-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines · -11 tokens per session 9444a7187850
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 91651149bba4
- 1mo ago Changed · -37 lines · -49 tokens per session 844b5307b520
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 22f2754b869d
aetox-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mikedev115/Aetox (48 stars, last pushed 15d ago), with no licence file. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 913 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ha-code-review
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
multi-reviewer-patterns
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
ha-skill-creator
Create, edit, improve, or audit Hope Agent skills. Use when the user wants to: (1) create a new skill from scratch, (2) edit or improve an existing skill, (3) review or clean up a SKILL.md file, (4) run evaluations to test skill effectiveness, (5) optimize skill descriptions for better trigger accuracy. Trigger…
ha-browser
Hope Agent browser automation — the standard status → tabs → snapshot → act loop, stale-ref recovery rules, and what to do when login / 2FA / captcha / camera-prompt / dialog blocks progress. Load this skill whenever you reach for the browser tool. Trigger on: user asks the agent to open / control / click / scrape /…
ha-logs
A read-only troubleshooting skill for querying Hope Agent’s local SQLite databases, which store logs, conversations, and background-job status.