Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MikeManifold/codex-unified. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MikeManifold/codex-unified/main/.codex/skills/pushing-ci-changes/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MikeManifold/codex-unifiedWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikemanifold/codex-unified/pushing-ci-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikemanifold/codex-unified/pushing-ci-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikemanifold/codex-unified/pushing-ci-changes.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00176 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
pushing-ci-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pushing-ci-changes — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
The Codex repository prevents anyone from uploading changes to its CI configuration unless they've been granted a temporary role.
In order to push changes to .github/**/*.yml and related files you'll need the user to read
go/workflow-approvals and request an approval through that flow. It is not possible for you to
make progress by requesting an exemption yourself.
If you know you're about to push changes that would fail due to these restrictions you should still try to push anyways to confirm the user's account doesn't already have the necessary approval.
If you encounter a failed push due to these restrictions, share the go/workflow-approvals link with the user and ask them to return control to you once the approval has propagated to GitHub.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 18 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 1e5d0e3260f1
pushing-ci-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository MikeManifold/codex-unified (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 176 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pushing-ci-changes, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-migrate
Cross-repo migration swarm — one coordinator + N parallel subagents (one per target repo) that apply the same transformation, open PRs, wait for CI, and report back to a shared JSON ledger. Coordinator handles topology, conflict auto-rebase, and stop-on-novel-failure. Use when bumping a shared dependency, rolling out…
zb-release-pipeline
Generate a GitHub Actions pipeline that builds a zb (Zero Dependencies Builder) project and publishes a GitHub Release with the produced JAR. Use whenever the user wants CI/CD, a build pipeline, a release workflow, or GitHub Actions for a zb-based Java project — phrases like "set up GitHub Actions for this zb…
publish-npm-package
Configure or troubleshoot npm package publication with GitHub Actions and npm Trusted Publishing. Use this skill for JavaScript or TypeScript packages. Also use it for the npm package in a mixed-language repository. Do not use it for applications or repositories without an npm package. Do not use it for generic CI…
deployment-patterns
Deployment workflows, CI/CD pipeline patterns, Docker containerization, health checks, rollback strategies, and production readiness checklists for web applications. Use when setting up deployment infrastructure or planning releases.
implement
Drive a single workshop ticket through the inner SWE↔Tester loop. Resolves the ticket from implementyourself/tasks/, creates an implementing/from-scratch branch (a fixed default — not derived from the ticket; subsequent tickets stack on top), launches the software-engineer agent to implement it, then routes by…
baby-sit
Monitor a GitHub pull request until CI is green, diagnose failures, and rerun only evidence-backed flaky GitHub Actions jobs.