Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mikeprasad/aria-knowledge --skill autogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mikeprasad/aria-knowledgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikeprasad/aria-knowledge/auto)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikeprasad/aria-knowledge/auto"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikeprasad/aria-knowledge/auto/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikeprasad/aria-knowledge/auto"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikeprasad/aria-knowledge/auto.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00277 | $0.17415 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00111 | $0.06966 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00055 | $0.03483 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01741 |
Grade A, and why
auto scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -37 tokens per session a5a221833508
- 1mo ago Changed ee85bf4e98d6
- 1mo ago Changed · +31 lines 98b7ed0c3029
- 1mo ago Changed · +54 lines a000e59e02cc
- 1mo ago First seen · 491 lines · 314 tokens per session scan A 104ea7812a3f
auto is a skill published in the GitHub repository mikeprasad/aria-knowledge (17 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 277 tokens to every session and 17,415 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bad-case-to-dpo
A guide to turning failed production agent runs into training and evaluation data. It explains how to find the first mistake, create preference examples for DPO (Direct Preference Optimization), and check that a fix does not damage other tasks.
autonomous-pipeline
Orchestrate the full AIDLC Autonomous Pipeline from a one-sentence requirement to a PR-ready delivery with TDD methodology. DDD drives judgment, SDD produces specs, TDD verifies delivery. Stages: Evaluate, Think, Plan, Build, Review, Test, Deliver, Reflect. Checkpoints on BLOCK or context limits. TRIGGER: "run…
test-driven-development
TDD: enforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, tests before code.
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code.
loop-engineering
A guide to building reliable loops for AI agents that plan, act, check their work, and continue until a task is truly complete. It includes independent verification and a proposer-reviewer pattern in which one agent's work is checked using outside evidence.
agent-evaluation
A guide to measuring whether an AI agent works reliably on the tasks that matter. It covers repeatable test environments, program checks, human-like scoring rules, failure analysis, and experiments that separate model problems from system problems.