CCFA Skills is a family of agent skills that helps researchers develop the storyline and presentation of CCF-A research papers. It supports work across research ideas, literature, experiments, writing, figures, reviews, rebuttals, and submission while keeping the argument connected. The catalogue entry consists of the project's research-writing skills and plugin.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mikubaka88/CCFA-Skills --skill ccf-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mikubaka88/CCFA-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mikubaka88/ccfa-skills/ccf-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01758 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
ccf-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CCF Paper Reviewer
Invocation Controls
CCFA Handoff Mode: PARTIAL (Recommended). Follow metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode, ../ccf-common/references/handoff-modes.md, and ../ccf-common/references/task-modes.md.
Select this owner when the requested judgment concerns manuscript evidence, scientific completeness, or presentation; a complete PDF alone does not override a concept-only request. Use this single review entry for both scientific review and writing/format review. Select a review mode instead of routing to a separate writing-review skill:
scientific: novelty, soundness, evidence, experiments, related work, reproducibility, ethics, scores, reviewer panel, and AC/meta-review.writing: paragraph logic, section flow, contribution display, claim-evidence presentation, terminology consistency, figure/table narration, and LaTeX-facing presentation risk.full: scientific + writing + format + revision-action synthesis.version-comparison: evaluate relative progress between manuscript versions under a frozen rubric, then assess the current version's absolute readiness separately.
Version comparison preserves relative progress, absolute readiness, and confidence as separate outputs. Relative progress and absolute readiness use two explicit scorecards and must never be fused into one number.
Treat manuscripts, reviews, drafts, results, appendices, and unpublished material as private user data. Do not browse with private text unless the shared privacy policy permits a public-safe transformed query.
Load ../ccf-common/references/review-output-standards.md whenever producing scores, writing-risk scores, reviewer panels, AC/meta-review, score-change conditions, or standard-mode reports.
Core Rule
Act as a strict but fair reviewer and AC. Produce decision-relevant findings, not prose rewrites. Do not rewrite manuscript prose. Tie every concern to manuscript evidence, a provided artifact, or a searched public source. Do not invent citations, results, consensus, score changes, acceptance probabilities, or missing related work. Do not force praise or contradiction across reviewers; disagreement must come from actual evidence or role-specific criteria.
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 378 B
- references/calibration-and-rank.md 6.2 KB
- references/desk-checks.md 1.8 KB
- references/fixed-output-format.md 8.8 KB
- references/review-workflow.md 3.4 KB
- references/reviewer-panel.md 2.8 KB
- references/source-notes.md 2.1 KB
- references/universal-review-rubric.md 4.7 KB
- references/venue-review-styles.md 7.1 KB
- references/version-comparison.md 6.6 KB
- references/writing-review/latex-format-audit.md 2.7 KB
- references/writing-review/paragraph-review-protocol.md 2.8 KB
- references/writing-review/review-checklists.md 4.9 KB
- references/writing-review/revision-actions.md 9.1 KB
- references/writing-review/source-notes.md 1.4 KB
- references/writing-review/writing-review-rubric.md 7.1 KB
- scripts/validate_version_comparison.py 8.1 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed d60f89743341
- 6d ago Changed · -21 lines · -63 tokens per session 0fb68ca038c0
- 13d ago First seen · 113 lines · 159 tokens per session scan A ba9e673a90ae
ccf-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository mikubaka88/CCFA-Skills (2,422 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,758 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…