garch-method

garch-method is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from milesdeutscher/garchmethod. It costs 94 tokens per session (998 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A trading workflow for forecasting price volatility and adjusting position size with a walk-forward GARCH(1,1) model. It estimates the likely size of future moves, not their direction, and includes scripts for forecasts, sizing, and backtesting.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to forecast daily or annualised volatility for a ticker or price file, classify calm or storm regimes, calculate a volatility-targeted size multiplier, and compare sizing methods on an existing strategy.
Why use it?
It helps control risk when expected market movement changes, while avoiding the claim that volatility forecasting can say whether an asset will go up or down. Walk-forward testing uses past information in sequence to reduce look-ahead bias.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the garchmethod plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/milesdeutscher/garchmethod/garch
Any agent
npx skills add milesdeutscher/garchmethod --skill garch
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/milesdeutscher/garchmethod

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install garchmethod, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for garch-method

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milesdeutscher/garchmethod/garch.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/milesdeutscher/garchmethod/garch)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milesdeutscher/garchmethod/garch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milesdeutscher/garchmethod/garch.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 94 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 998 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00094 $0.00998
Opus 5 $0.00047 $0.00499
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00200
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00100

Measured 5d ago against content hash 22c97cf753c2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

garch-method scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/garch/SKILL.md · 82 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GARCH Method — volatility forecasting + position sizing

This skill answers the question retail never asks and every fund asks daily: how much?

It does NOT predict direction. GARCH forecasts the magnitude of moves — how violent tomorrow is likely to be, not which way it goes. Say this to the user whenever presenting results.

The three tools

All scripts live in scripts/ and run with uv run (dependencies resolve automatically via inline metadata — nothing to pip-install).

1. garch_forecast.py — the forecast

Walk-forward GARCH(1,1), zero lookahead (params re-estimated every 21 days on an expanding window; the recursion rolls forward between refits using only past data).

uv run scripts/garch_forecast.py --csv prices.csv --json
uv run scripts/garch_forecast.py --ticker BTC-USD --json

Output: 1-day-ahead vol forecast (daily + annualized), vol percentile vs trailing year, regime (calm / normal / storm).

2. vol_target.py — the size

The entire idea: size = target_vol / forecast_vol, capped at [0.25x, 2.0x].

uv run scripts/vol_target.py --csv prices.csv --target-vol 15 --json

Output: position size multiplier. "Run 0.6x your baseline" — that's the answer.

3. compare.py — the honest test

Runs the same signals twice — fixed size vs vol-targeted — and shows both equity curves plus stats side by side. Ships with an EMA 9/21 crossover demo; accepts any strategy via --signals mine.csv (columns: date, signal in {-1,0,1}).

uv run scripts/compare.py --csv prices.csv --target-vol 58 --chart equity.png --json
uv run scripts/compare.py --csv prices.csv --signals mine.csv

Output: CAGR, ann vol, Sharpe, max drawdown, worst month, final equity — both versions — plus the equity-curve chart with storm regimes shaded.

JSON contract

Every script supports --json. Core output shape:

{
  "as_of": "2026-05-23",
  "forecast_vol_annualized_pct": 41.2,
  "vol_percentile_1y": 78.0,
  "regime": "storm",
  "position_size_multiplier": 0.6,
  "note": "GARCH forecasts magnitude (volatility), not direction."
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 82 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 82 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 22c97cf753c2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

garch-method is a skill published in the GitHub repository milesdeutscher/garchmethod (128 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 998 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sector-rotation

行业轮动分析——申万行业景气度评分、行业动量排名、产业链传导、估值/盈利/资金流多维比较框架.

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · 39 tokens

twitter-reader

Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…

himself65/finance-skills · 161 tokens

strategy-pivot-designer

Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.

tradermonty/claude-trading-skills · 28 tokens

chenhao-limit-up

Use when evaluating A-share limit-up (涨停板) setups through Chen Hao's sentiment and momentum lens: market emotion cycles, board strength, follow-through, and short-term aggressive momentum trading.

questflowai/investorskills · 44 tokens

trading-risk-gate

Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.

winstonkoh87/Athena-Public · 53 tokens

multi-expert-analyzer

针对通用问题进行多领域专家联合分析, 综合稿产生前必经 fact-checker 与 red-team 两道独立校验。适用场景: 用户提出跨领域或不确定领域的复杂问题, 需要从多个专家角度分别搜证并相互校验后综合成文, 例如该不该买房、该不该跳槽、是否进入某个赛道等。触发关键词: 多角度分析、专家分析、综合分析、多视角、跨领域分析、从不同角度看、深度分析。问题只属于单一明确领域时, 优先使用该领域的专门 skill, 例如纯财务用 finance-core-analysis、纯技术用 software-architect。输出 (全部 markdown 保存到当前项目 markdown/ 目录): (1) 每位专家的中间分析稿…

digoal/blog · 292 tokens