openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734 is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mileson/openprd. It costs 36 tokens per session (1,050 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260608160326, MIT.

A draft diagnostic-knowledge skill for capturing recurring quality problems and the evidence found while investigating them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review feature-coverage gaps, affected files, validation signals, and possible causes before planning follow-up work.
Why use it?
It helps explain why quality checks still need attention and keeps those findings available for future fixes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to review feature-coverage gaps, affected files, validation signals, and possible causes before planning follow-up work.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mileson/openprd --skill openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mileson/openprd

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,050 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.01050
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00525
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00210
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00105

Measured 11d ago against content hash 080b7ee83f52, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260608160326 — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.openprd/knowledge/drafts/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734/SKILL.md · 77 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734

状态:draft 候选目录:.openprd/knowledge/candidates/candidate-eval-20260609094734 Promote:openprd quality . --learn --from .openprd/knowledge/candidates/candidate-eval-20260609094734

触发条件

  • 本轮结果里已经出现可复用的症状、排查线索或根因模式,不应该只留在当前对话里。
  • 这次改动直接影响 Agent / harness / hook / skill 行为,后续很容易再次踩到同类判断问题。
  • feature-coverage
  • 症状: 质量门禁需要关注: feature-coverage
  • doctor-green: doctor passed
  • quality-verify: quality needs-attention | attention gates: feature-coverage | touched: README.md, package.json, scripts/dev-check-wrapup-copy.mjs, scripts/openprd-codex-isolated-worker.mjs, scripts/openprd-dev-check.mjs, scripts/openprd-github-release-notes.mjs
  • dev-check: dev-check attention=2, warning=3 | touched: skills/openprd-router/SKILL.md, skills/openprd-frontend-design/SKILL.md, skills/openprd-harness/SKILL.md, skills/openprd-frontend-design/references/design-asset-contract.md, skills/openprd-frontend-design/references/direction-engine.md, src/run-harness.js
  • dev-check: dev-check attention=2, warning=3 | touched: skills/openprd-router/SKILL.md, skills/openprd-frontend-design/SKILL.md, skills/openprd-harness/SKILL.md, src/run-harness.js, src/agent-integration.js, src/design-starter.js

适用范围

  • 抽象模式: 质量缺口反复出现,通常是因为可观测性、护栏、测试与复盘知识被分散维护,没有进入同一套项目级诊断闭环。
  • 适用于项目源码或核心流程已经落地、需要把实现经验固化为项目知识的任务。
  • 特别适用于 Agent、hook、harness、quality 或 growth 工作流改动,避免下次再次靠聊天上下文兜底。

典型输入

  • 任务场景: 质量门禁收口(feature-coverage)
  • 相关文件: package.json、scripts/dev-check-wrapup-copy.mjs、scripts/openprd-codex-isolated-worker.mjs、scripts/openprd-dev-check.mjs、scripts/openprd-github-release-notes.mjs、scripts/openprd-review-presentation.mjs
  • 已有证据类型: quality-report
  • 验证信号: doctor-green、quality-verify、dev-check

典型输出

  • 项目经验候选与诊断包
  • 待确认的项目经验草案
  • 验证结论: doctor passed
  • 可复用的验证链路与收尾动作

下次触发时先看什么

  • package.json
  • scripts/dev-check-wrapup-copy.mjs
  • scripts/openprd-codex-isolated-worker.mjs
  • scripts/openprd-dev-check.mjs
  • scripts/openprd-github-release-notes.mjs
  • scripts/openprd-review-presentation.mjs
  • scripts/quality-perf-check.mjs
  • src/agent-integration.js
  • src/benchmark/constants.js
  • src/benchmark/operations.js
  • src/benchmark/registry.js
  • .openprd/quality/reports/eval-20260609094734.json

Read the full file on GitHub · 77 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 77 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 080b7ee83f52

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260609094734 is a skill published in the GitHub repository mileson/openprd (50 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,050 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260608160326, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.