Verifying candidate experience against development-check results and promoting a suitable candidate into the project’s knowledge store.

It helps avoid reusing past project experience without first checking whether it fits the current task.

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705

Q: What is openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705?

A draft skill for deciding whether a recorded software-project experience is relevant enough to reuse. It includes trigger conditions based on checks run during development and lists a command for promoting the draft into project knowledge.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add mileson/openprd --skill openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mileson/openprd

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mileson/openprd/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 997 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits

NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026

How audits are shown

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00036	$0.00997
Opus 5	$0.00018	$0.00498
Sonnet 5	$0.00007	$0.00199
Haiku 4.5	$0.00004	$0.00100

Measured 12d ago against content hash f299bd362f72, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.openprd/knowledge/drafts/openprd-experience-quality-candidate-eval-20260620185705/SKILL.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.