Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG --skill guidancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTGWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/guidance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/guidance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/guidance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/guidance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/guidance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.04094 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.02047 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00819 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00409 |
Grade A, and why
guidance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to guidance — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 581 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Guidance: Constrained LLM Generation
When to Use This Skill
Use Guidance when you need to:
- Control LLM output syntax with regex or grammars
- Guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation
- Reduce latency vs traditional prompting approaches
- Enforce structured formats (dates, emails, IDs, etc.)
- Build multi-step workflows with Pythonic control flow
- Prevent invalid outputs through grammatical constraints
GitHub Stars: 18,000+ | From: Microsoft Research
Installation
# Base installation
pip install guidance
# With specific backends
pip install guidance[transformers] # Hugging Face models
pip install guidance[llama_cpp] # llama.cpp models
Quick Start
Basic Example: Structured Generation
from guidance import models, gen
# Load model (supports OpenAI, Transformers, llama.cpp)
lm = models.OpenAI("gpt-4")
# Generate with constraints
result = lm + "The capital of France is " + gen("capital", max_tokens=5)
print(result["capital"]) # "Paris"
Chat format with a local model
Constraint support requires local logit access. Regex,
select(), and grammar-based constrained generation only work with local backends (Transformers,LlamaCpp). Remote API backends (OpenAI, and Azure variants) support unconstrainedgen()/ chat only — they cannot enforce token-level constraints. guidance 0.3.x has nomodels.Anthropicclass.
from guidance import models, gen, system, user, assistant
# Local model (supports constrained generation)
lm = models.Transformers("microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct")
# Use context managers for chat format
with system():
lm += "You are a helpful assistant."
with user():
lm += "What is the capital of France?"
with assistant():
lm += gen(max_tokens=20)
Core Concepts
1. Context Managers
Guidance uses Pythonic context managers for chat-style interactions.
from guidance import system, user, assistant, gen
lm = models.Transformers("microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct")
# System message
with system():
lm += "You are a JSON generation expert."
# User message
with user():
lm += "Generate a person object with name and age."
# Assistant response
with assistant():
lm += gen("response", max_tokens=100)
print(lm["response"])
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 581 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A e6549204b864
guidance is a skill published in the GitHub repository MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG (15 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 4,094 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to guidance, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hunt-llm-ai
Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration viatool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling…
lijigang-skill
A Chinese-language approach to writing precise, highly structured prompts, sometimes using Lisp-like notation. It combines concise wording, philosophical questioning, and a process for defining roles, conditions, output formats, and revisions.
baoyu-skill
A Chinese-language approach to explaining AI tools and writing prompts—instructions that tell an AI what you want. It emphasizes step-by-step teaching, hands-on testing, plain-language technical explanations, and organized knowledge sharing.
interactive-prompt-analyzer
World-class prompt analyzer v3: multi-modal, predictive, self-improving, context-aware, with real-time cost estimation, counterfactual reasoning, cross-session learning, adversarial testing, and autonomous optimization.
prompt-enhancer
Use when the user asks to enhance, improve, refine, rewrite, strengthen, or validate a prompt, or says "make this prompt better". Returns a clearer, more specific, better structured version of the prompt without executing it, picking validation checks from the prompt's own context. Contexts include coding, research…
prompt-optimize-zh
A prompt review assistant that examines an AI instruction and returns problems, an improved version, and an explanation of the changes. A prompt is the text that tells an AI what to do.