Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mimaworks/governance-mcp --skill mima-check-readinessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mimaworks/governance-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-check-readiness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-check-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-check-readiness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-check-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-check-readiness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
mima-check-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 86 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 8d36ceaf27c1
mima-check-readiness is a skill published in the GitHub repository mimaworks/governance-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 856 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.
interpret-results
Interprets AIR Blackbox scan results and maps findings to specific EU AI Act articles, recitals, and remediation steps. Use when the user has scan output and wants to understand what to fix, why it matters, or how to prioritize.
complyedge-eu-ai-act-runtime-deny
Runtime deny for EU AI Act Article 5 and Article 50 on this prompt or output via ComplyEdge TrustLint MCP. Use when the user wants agent I/O compliance enforcement, not system classification, FRIA forms, or C2PA watermarking.
eu-ai-act-compliance-mcp
EU AI Act compliance checking and risk classification. Automated compliance validation for high-risk AI systems with Article 11 technical documentation generation.
GRC & Compliance
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation.
performing-soc2-type2-audit-preparation
Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security…