Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mimaworks/governance-mcp --skill mima-quarterly-evidencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mimaworks/governance-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-quarterly-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-quarterly-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-quarterly-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-quarterly-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mimaworks/governance-mcp/mima-quarterly-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01738 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00695 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00348 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
mima-quarterly-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A ea892d5b6908
mima-quarterly-evidence is a skill published in the GitHub repository mimaworks/governance-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,738 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
interpret-results
Interprets AIR Blackbox scan results and maps findings to specific EU AI Act articles, recitals, and remediation steps. Use when the user has scan output and wants to understand what to fix, why it matters, or how to prioritize.
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.
complyedge-eu-ai-act-check-and-cite
Check this prompt or output against EU AI Act Article 5 and Article 50 rules and cite the article, via the ComplyEdge TrustLint MCP. Use when the user wants agent I/O checked and cited, not system classification, FRIA forms, or C2PA watermarking.
get-started
Start with GSPC — read the live measurement board, verify a signed card, and list the signed cards relevant to one obligation. Measurement, not certification.
evidence-bundle
For ONE obligation (article-50, article-53 GPAI transparency, dora or cra) and an optional subject: the obligation record, its counsel-gate status and the already-signed measurement cards that are relevant to it, read from GET /api/evidence-bundle. The same module as the free MCP tool evidencebundlepreview.…
article50-detect
Verify a C2PA-style signed manifest for AI-generated content (EU AI Act Article 50) at POST https://councilof.ai/api/detect. Deterministically checks the Ed25519-signed metadata layer and the IPTC/schema.org digitalSourceType; returns AIMARKED / NOTAIMARKED / UNVERIFIABLE with a signed verdict receipt (in-toto/DSSE…