AI pull-request reviewer: hybrid RAG + a code graph + Claude Code. Whole-repo context, inline GitHub comments grounded on exact code. MCP server + Claude Code plugin.
Prepare a release of ragforgit — write human-readable Russian release notes into CHANGELOG.md, bump the version and rebuild plugin manifests. Use when the user asks to cut a release, bump the version, or prepare a dev → main merge ("подготовь релиз", "выпусти версию", "бампни версию", "release notes").
Answer grounded questions about the codebase (onboarding / Q&A) using the reviewer RAG + code graph. Use when the user asks how the code works, where something lives, or to explain a subsystem ("where is auth", "how does X work", "explain the indexing flow", "как устроено…", "где у нас…", "объясни код"). Requires a…
Use when configuring or changing a repository's tracked branches, layered review policy, ignored tracked paths, retrieval limits, summary depth, or non-secret task-board metadata.
After a task's PR is created, offer to close the task on the configured board and reindex it. Use when the user says a PR is up or asks to close or finish a task.
Review code changes only for maintainability risks: unnecessary complexity, poor readability, duplication, weak separation of concerns, and misalignment with repository conventions. Use when the user explicitly asks for maintainability review, code quality review, clean code review, complexity review, readability…
Review code changes only for performance and efficiency risks (N+1 queries, repeated work, bad asymptotics, missing batching/caching, blocking I/O, memory growth). Use when the user explicitly asks for a performance review of a diff/PR.
Build a human-facing reading guide for a GitHub pull request (where to start, what each file changes, what it impacts) using the reviewer PR session + code graph. Use when the user asks to walk a human reviewer through a PR ("PR walkthrough", "гид по PR", "как читать этот PR", "проведи по PR"). NOT a bug review (see…
Report a defect of reviewer or its plugin as an anonymized GitHub issue in mimfort/ragforgit, after explicit user approval. Use when a reviewer tool breaks its own contract, a skill prescribes an impossible step, a stated invariant fails, or the user asks to report a reviewer bug.
Review a GitHub pull request with the RAG + code-graph pipeline (reviewer MCP server). Use when the user asks to review a PR ("review PR 123", "заревьюй PR", a PR URL). Requires ParadeDB/Neo4j running and a built base index.
Gather disciplined context for solving a task, then hand off to development. Use when the user asks to solve/implement a task ("solve PRI-4", "rag-reviewer:solve-task ", "реши задачу X"). Reads a keyed task from the reviewer store, pulls related/similar tasks and relevant code, distills a brief, and enters…
Precompute concise per-subsystem summaries (GraphRAG community summaries) over the base code index, so ask / PR-walkthrough get a cheap high-level prior. Use when the user asks to build/refresh subsystem summaries ("просуммируй подсистемы", "построй обзоры модулей", "summarize subsystems"). Requires a built base index…
Build or update the reviewer base index (vector store + code graph) from a local repo clone. Use when the user asks to "index the codebase", "build the index", "sync the code", "rebuild the graph", "просиндексируй код", "построй индекс".
Warm the task graph and vector store by synchronizing a configured task board through the reviewer MCP server. Use when the user asks to sync or index board tasks.